Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 208clear

Sorted by relevance

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX III MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE INDIA LTD

Appeals are dismissed

C.A. No.-010815-010819 - 2014Supreme Court06 May 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

condoned. Leave granted. 1.1 These Civil Appeals have been filed by the Revenue, i.e. the Service Tax Department, being aggrieved by various orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (“CESTAT”, for the sake of convenience). 2. The orders passed by CESTAT in all these appeals have been in favour of the respondents-assessees. The CESTAT

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. M/S S.R.M.B.DIARY FARMING (P) LTD

Appeals are dismissed in terms of signed reportable

C.A. No.-019650-019650 - 2017Supreme Court23 Nov 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Section 268A

208 ELT 321 (SC) held as under: “The point raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is covered by the recent judgment of this court in Civil Appeal No. 4488 of 2005. CCE v. Mysore Electricals Industries Ltd. reported in [2006] (204) ELT 517 (SC). In the said judgment, this court held that a beneficial circular

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX III MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE INDIA LTD

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. M/S S.R.M.B.DIARY FARMING (P) LTD

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX III MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE INDIA LTD

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. M/S S.R.M.B.DIARY FARMING (P) LTD

M/S. ROTORK CONTROLA INDIA (P) LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. vs. M/S.AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ETC