Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI vs. M/S ELI LILLY & COMPANY (INDIA) P.LTD

C.A. No.-005114-005114 - 2007Supreme Court25 Mar 2009

Section 133ASection 192(1)Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(ii)

3) of section 200.” Penalty for Failure to Deduct Tax at Source: “Section 271C: (1) If any person fails to – (a) Deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or (b) Pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under, - (i) Sub-section

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. vs. M/S.AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ETC

C.A. No.-006703-006710 - 2009Supreme Court13 Apr 2018

Bench: Us.

3 SCC 111, the question was whether "Lip Salve" could be 66 classifiable as a preparation for care of skin or as a medicament. The product was mainly supplied to the Defence Department for use by military personnel who are posted in high-altitude areas. In Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta v. Sharma Chemical Works (2003) 5 SCC 60, this

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI vs. M/S ELI LILLY & COMPANY (INDIA) P.LTD

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. vs. M/S.AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ETC

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI vs. M/S ELI LILLY & COMPANY (INDIA) P.LTD

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. vs. M/S.AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ETC

GASTRADE INTERNATIONAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI vs. M/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD