BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Charitable Trustclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai491Mumbai400Ahmedabad320Pune282Bangalore207Jaipur186Delhi175Kolkata155Karnataka132Hyderabad99Cuttack50Surat50Chandigarh49Amritsar45Indore45Lucknow42Rajkot34Nagpur32Cochin32Visakhapatnam30Patna23Jodhpur19Raipur18Agra17Jabalpur8Ranchi8Guwahati5Allahabad5Panaji5Varanasi5Calcutta3Dehradun2SC2Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2763Section 276C3Section 139(1)3Section 12A3Section 271(1)(a)2Section 139(4)2Section 122

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (GWALIOR) M.P. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GWALIOR M.P

C.A. No.-006262-006262 - 2010Supreme Court16 Feb 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Section 12Section 12ASection 154Section 2(15)Section 21Section 260

charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Act, they were entitled to claim registration as provided under Section 12 (A) of the Act. Since the application for registration was delayed in its filing, the appellant also made an application for condonation of delay in filing the application. 5. By order dated 13.04.1999, the CIT (Gwalior) condoned the delay

PRAKASH NATH KHANNA vs. COMMNR OF INCOME TAX

Crl.A. No.-001260-001261 - 1997Supreme Court16 Feb 2004
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(a)Section 276Section 276C

delay in filing a return without contumacious conduct and mens rea being established could not make the petitioner liable for prosecution. 6. Petitioner having been subjected to levy of interest under Section 139(1) and also to penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(a) of the Act, could not further be prosecuted for the same defaults. Per contra, learned counsel