BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi88Karnataka37Mumbai30Bangalore22Calcutta21Amritsar11Telangana11Indore11Chennai8Jaipur6Hyderabad6Punjab & Haryana4SC4Ahmedabad3Agra3Allahabad3Kolkata3Cochin3Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Lucknow2Pune2Rajasthan2J&K1Rajkot1Chandigarh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 106Section 10(20)3Section 11(1)3Section 32Section 12A2Exemption2

M/S QUEEN'S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-005167-005167 - 2008Supreme Court16 Mar 2015

Bench: The Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital, May Be Gleaned From The Facts Of One Of Them, Namely, The Queen’S Educational Society Case. The Appellant Filed Its Return For Assessment Years 2000-2001 & 2001-2002 Showing A Net Surplus Of Rs.6,58,862/- & Rs.7,82,632/- Respectively. Since The Appellant Was Established With The Sole 2

Section 10Section 10(22)Section 260A

260A of the Income Tax Act, the High Court vide the impugned judgment set aside the judgment of the ITAT and affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. 4. These appeals from the Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital, concern themselves with the provision of Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Act: “Section 10- Incomes not included in total income.—In computing

MANSAROVAR COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI

C.A. No.-005769-005769 - 2022Supreme Court
10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 26Section 6(3)

Charitable Trust (iii) interest accrued/paid on the unsecured loans and (iv) provision for income tax (which was disallowed). Separate penalty proceedings were initiated under sections 271(1)(a). 271(1)(c), 273/274 and 271-B of the Act. 2.12 The assessees then preferred appeals before the CIT(A). Subsequently on 08th December, 2000, the writ petitions filed by the assessees

U.P. FOREST CORPORATION vs. DY. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-009432-009432 - 2003Supreme Court27 Nov 2007
For Respondent: DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 3Section 3(3)Section 3(31)

260A of the Act before the High Court. By the impugned order dated 26th November 2002, the High Court has remanded the matter to the Tribunal for considering the matter afresh. Aggrieved by the said order, the Corporation is in appeal before us by filing the aforementioned appeals. The Revenue has also filed Civil Appeal No. 9437 of 2003 against

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KANPUR vs. CANARA BANK

The appeals are dismissed

C.A. No.-006020-006020 - 2018Supreme Court02 Jul 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 194ASection 3

260A of the Act before the High Court. 6 The Division Bench of the High Court vide its judgment dated 04.04.2016 has dismissed the appeal. The Division Bench came to the following conclusions while dismissing the appeal:  "We have, therefore, no manner of doubt from a reading   of   the   provisions   of   the   Industrial Area Development Act that the NOIDA