BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 256(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka425Delhi128Mumbai54Bangalore26Jaipur19Calcutta17Chennai13Visakhapatnam12Lucknow9Cochin9Agra8Kolkata7Chandigarh7Ahmedabad7Pune5Rajkot5SC5Telangana5Amritsar4Hyderabad3Rajasthan2Nagpur1Andhra Pradesh1Raipur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 119Exemption4Section 12A3Section 2542Section 1432Section 256(1)2Section 10(20)2Section 4(3)2Section 11(1)(a)2

GANGABAI CHARITIES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

C.A. No.-010803-010805 - 1983Supreme Court24 Jul 1992
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR
Section 1(1)(a)Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 256(1)

trust income or accumulation were http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 6 expended for charitable purposes. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal referred the following question to the High Court under Section 256(1

K.R. PATEL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-005649-005649 - 1990Supreme Court27 Aug 1999
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For Respondent:
Section 161Section 256(1)

trust for whole charitable and religious purposes its income was exempt from tax under Section 11(1) of the Act. Various other contentions were raised but all these were rejected by the Income- tax Officer who assessed the income in the hands of the executors and trustees as executors. Against order of the Income-Tax Officer appeal was filed before

M/S.RADHA-SAOMI SAT SANG,SAOMI BAGH,AGRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-010574-010583 - 1983Supreme Court15 Nov 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 11Section 35Section 4(3)Section 66(2)

trust or legal obli- gation, (b) the property should be so held for charitable or religious purposes which enure for the benefit of the pub- lic. [317 E-G] 1.03. The property was given to the Satguru for the common purpose of furthering the objects of the Sat Guru. The property was therefore subject to a legal liability of being

ASSISTANT COMMNR., INCOME TAX, RAJKOT vs. SAURASHTRA KUTCH STOCK EXCHANGE LTD

C.A. No.-001171-001171 - 2004Supreme Court15 Sept 2008
Section 11Section 12ASection 143Section 154Section 25Section 254

charitable institution’ entitled to exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act from payment of income-tax. The assessee, therefore, made an application on February 10, 1992 for registration under Section 12A of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot registered 2 it on July 8, 1996. The assessee filed its return of income on October

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW. vs. U.P. FOREST CORPORATION

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-000180-000182 - 1989Supreme Court02 Mar 1998
For Respondent: U.P. FOREST CORPORATION
Section 10(20)Section 11(1)Section 17Section 256Section 3Section 3(3)Section 3(31)

256 of the Income Tax Act, the respondent chose to file three writ petitions in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Tribunal in respect to the assessment years 1977-78 and 1980-81 and order of the Assessing Authority for assessment year 1984-85 which had been made by it. These writ petitions were entertained