M/S QUEEN'S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX
C.A. No.-005167-005167 - 2008Supreme Court16 Mar 2015
Bench: The Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital, May Be Gleaned From The Facts Of One Of Them, Namely, The Queen’S Educational Society Case. The Appellant Filed Its Return For Assessment Years 2000-2001 & 2001-2002 Showing A Net Surplus Of Rs.6,58,862/- & Rs.7,82,632/- Respectively. Since The Appellant Was Established With The Sole 2
Section 10Section 10(22)Section 260A
Section 2
clause (15) derives considerable support from the
speech made by the Finance Minister while
introducing that provision. The Finance Minister
explained the reason for introducing this
exclusionary clause in the following words:
“The definition of ‘charitable purpose’ in that clause
is at present so widely worded that it can be taken
advantage of even by commercial concerns which