BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,976Delhi1,667Chennai1,119Ahmedabad846Bangalore817Pune765Karnataka619Kolkata480Jaipur466Hyderabad280Surat217Chandigarh211Cochin189Amritsar163Indore150Rajkot149Lucknow138Cuttack123Visakhapatnam111Nagpur101Agra65Allahabad58Raipur55Jodhpur54Patna52Calcutta44Telangana40Ranchi32SC25Dehradun23Panaji23Varanasi20Jabalpur19Guwahati16Kerala13Rajasthan10Punjab & Haryana8Orissa6Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 12A20Exemption16Section 1115Section 1012Section 10(20)8Section 2(15)5Section 11(1)5Section 37(1)5Addition to Income5Section 3

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

C.A. No.-021762-021762 - 2017Supreme Court19 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

charitable or religious purposes.” 21 Earlier, sub-section (4A) was inserted by the Finance Act, 1983, w.e.f. 01.04.1984, and read as follows: “(4A) Sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (3A) shall not apply in relation to any income of a trust

ASST. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. THANTHI TRUST

C.A. No.-004406-004410 - 1996Supreme Court31 Jan 2001
For Respondent: THANTHI TRUST ETC. ETC
Section 11Section 148Section 2(15)Section 4(3)(i)

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

4
Charitable Trust4
Penalty2

charitable or religious purposes. (4A) Sub-Section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (3A) shall not apply in relation to any income, being profits and gains of business, unless (a) the business is carried on by a trust

M/S NEW NOBLE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1

The appeals are hereby dismissed, without order on costs

C.A. No.-003795-003795 - 2014Supreme Court19 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 10

Trust, [1988] 169 ITR 379 (Raj)). As “education” falls within the scope of “charitable purpose” both under section 2(5) of A.P. Act 30 of 1987 and section

PRAKASH NATH KHANNA vs. COMMNR OF INCOME TAX

Crl.A. No.-001260-001261 - 1997Supreme Court16 Feb 2004
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(a)Section 276Section 276C

trust or other legal obligation wholly for charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2

ASSISTANT COMMNR., INCOME TAX, RAJKOT vs. SAURASHTRA KUTCH STOCK EXCHANGE LTD

C.A. No.-001171-001171 - 2004Supreme Court15 Sept 2008
Section 11Section 12ASection 143Section 154Section 25Section 254

charitable institution’ entitled to exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act from payment of income-tax. The assessee, therefore, made an application on February 10, 1992 for registration under Section 12A of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot registered 2 it on July 8, 1996. The assessee filed its return of income on October

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX vs. GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD

Appeal stand dismissed with no order as to costs

C.A. No.-005656-005656 - 2007Supreme Court05 Dec 2007
For Respondent: Gujarat Maritime Board
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 2(15)Section 3(2)Section 3(31)Section 36Section 73

trust. Therefore, the Board was not entitled to be registered as a Charitable Institution. It was the case of the Department that the Board was performing statutory functions. Development of minor ports in the state of Gujarat cannot be termed as the work undertaking for charitable purposes and in the circumstances the Commissioner rejected the Board’s application under Section

K.R. PATEL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-005649-005649 - 1990Supreme Court27 Aug 1999
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 161Section 256(1)

2 thereof. Applicability of the Bombay Public Trust Act is again not disputed. Under Section 18 of the Bombay Public Trust Act it shall be the duty of the trustee of a public trust to which that Act applies to make an application for registration of the public trust. Section 29 of applies to public trust created by will

GANGABAI CHARITIES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

C.A. No.-010803-010805 - 1983Supreme Court24 Jul 1992
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR
Section 1(1)(a)Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 256(1)

2)79 ACT: Income tax Act, 1961-Section 11(1)(a)-Construction of trust deed-Kalyana Mandapam and Printing press-Income derived by trust-Whether exemption entitled. HEADNOTE: A trust namely, "Ganga Bai Charities" was created on 13.9.1958, to construct and provide a building for the benefit of the public to be used for religious, charitable

M/S QUEEN'S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-005167-005167 - 2008Supreme Court16 Mar 2015

Bench: The Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital, May Be Gleaned From The Facts Of One Of Them, Namely, The Queen’S Educational Society Case. The Appellant Filed Its Return For Assessment Years 2000-2001 & 2001-2002 Showing A Net Surplus Of Rs.6,58,862/- & Rs.7,82,632/- Respectively. Since The Appellant Was Established With The Sole 2

Section 10Section 10(22)Section 260A

trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution and to the Assessing Officer;] Section 11. Income from property held for charitable or religious purposes.— (5) The forms and modes of investing or depositing the money referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (2

M/S. ANANDA SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, we find that there is no reason to

C.A. No.-005437-005438 - 2012Supreme Court19 Feb 2020

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 12ASection 13

2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996)] and subsequently it is noticed that the activities of the trust or the institution are being carried out in a manner that the provisions of sections 11 and 12 do not apply to exclude either whole or any part of the income of such trust or institution due to operation of sub- section

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI vs. SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY

The appeal is allowed to the above extent

C.A. No.-000614-000614 - 2023Supreme Court31 Jan 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Section 10Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

charitable trust entitled to the benefit of exemption 1 dated 16.11.2021 in ITA No. 161/2021 Digitally signed by NEETA SAPRA Date: 2023.02.03 17:52:05 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified 2 and that it is registered under Section

M/S.RADHA-SAOMI SAT SANG,SAOMI BAGH,AGRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-010574-010583 - 1983Supreme Court15 Nov 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 11Section 35Section 4(3)Section 66(2)

2 of 8 the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that the income derived by the Radha Swami Satsang, a religious institution, was entitled to exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?", the High Court answered the question in favour of the Revenuerespondent, holding that the trust deed was revocable and the conditions

MANSAROVAR COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI

C.A. No.-005769-005769 - 2022Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 26Section 6(3)

section 148 of the ACT by ACIT, Company Circle 2, New Delhi. CA 5769/2022 Etc. Page 7 of 67 2.11 That on 09th October, 1998, separate assessment orders were passed by the ACIT, Company Circle 2(2), New Delhi for each of the Assessment Years in question. The Assessing Officer concluded that each of the assessees were “intentionally trying

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW. vs. U.P. FOREST CORPORATION

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-000180-000182 - 1989Supreme Court02 Mar 1998
For Respondent: U.P. FOREST CORPORATION
Section 10(20)Section 11(1)Section 17Section 256Section 3Section 3(3)Section 3(31)

2) of Section 45, which elucidates the said power also shows that the said power is confined to internal management of the corporation and the service conditions of its employees only". (emphasis added) Applying the ratio of the aforesaid decisions to the facts of the present case, we find that it is not possible to hold that the Corporation

KERALA STATE BEVERAGES MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1)

Accordingly, the civil appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

C.A. No.-000011-000011 - 2022Supreme Court03 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40

Charitable Trust v. State of Haryana & Ors.4;  Kailash Nath Agarwal  & Ors.  v.  Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. & Anr.5; and Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd.6.  The judgment relied on by the learned ASG in the case of  Jalkal Vibhag Nagar Nigam and Others3 would not render any assistance to support the case of the revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KANPUR vs. CANARA BANK

The appeals are dismissed

C.A. No.-006020-006020 - 2018Supreme Court02 Jul 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 194ASection 3

2)[***] (3)   The   provisions   of   sub­section   (1)   shall not apply ­ (i).... 5[***] (iii) to such income credited or paid to­ (a)   any   banking   company   to   which   the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), applies,   or   any   co­operative   society engaged   in   carrying   on   the   business   of banking   (including   a   co­operative   land mortgage bank), or (b) any financial corporation established

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. SINGHAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY

The appeals are dismissed with the aforesaid observations

C.A. No.-011080-011080 - 2017Supreme Court29 Aug 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 142Section 153C

charitable or religious purposes (Section 11) and income from contributions are exempt from taxation under certain circumstances. 4) It so happened that a search and seizure operation was carried out under Section 132 of the Act on one Mr. M.N. Navale, President of the 3 assessee Society, and his wife on July 20, 2005 from where certain documents were seized

U.P. FOREST CORPORATION vs. DY. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-009432-009432 - 2003Supreme Court27 Nov 2007
For Respondent: DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 3Section 3(3)Section 3(31)

2 of 3 case of Valjibhai Muljibhai Soneji v. State of Bombay, (now Gujarat) [1964] 3 SCR 686 wherein it was held that the definitions given in the General Clauses Act, govern all Central Acts and Regulations made after the commencement of this Act. Following the said decision, this Court held that even though Section

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (GWALIOR) M.P. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GWALIOR M.P

C.A. No.-006262-006262 - 2010Supreme Court16 Feb 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Section 12Section 12ASection 154Section 2(15)Section 21Section 260

charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Act, they were entitled to claim registration as provided under Section 12 (A) of the Act. Since the application for registration was delayed in its filing, the appellant also made an application for condonation of delay in filing the application. 5. By order dated 13.04.1999, the CIT (Gwalior) condoned the delay

M/S APEX LABORATORIES P. LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT II

The appeal is dismissed without order on costs

C.A. No.-001554-001554 - 2022Supreme Court22 Feb 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 142(1)Section 37(1)

trust reposed in doctors. Therefore, it is a matter of great public importance and concern, when it is demonstrated that a doctor’s prescription can be manipulated, and driven by the motive to avail the freebies offered to them by pharmaceutical companies, ranging from gifts such as gold coins, fridges and LCD TVs to funding international trips for vacations