BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore39Mumbai28Delhi21Rajkot9SC8Raipur8Ahmedabad6Chennai4Jodhpur3Kolkata2Jaipur2Surat2Nagpur1Indore1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 80J12Section 807Section 80E(1)7Deduction7Section 32A5Section 80P(4)5Section 15C4Section 256(2)3Section 80P(2)(a)3Depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. PATIALA FLOUR MILLS CO. PVT. LTD., PATIALA

- 0Supreme Court06 Oct 1968
For Respondent: PATIALA FLOUR MILLS CO. PVT. LTD., PATIALA
Section 1Section 32Section 32ASection 80Section 801Section 80J

capital employed during the assessment year in question. It is impossible to see how, by any process of construction, even by turning, and twisting the language of sub-section (1) of section 80J, it can be held that for the purpose of allowing the deduction contemplated under that section the profits or gains

THE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,CIRCLE 1, BOMBAY

3
Set Off of Losses2
Addition to Income2

In the result, Transferred Cases No

T.C.(C) No.-000020-000024 - 1989Supreme Court08 Aug 2000
For Respondent: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI & OTHERS
Section 256(2)Section 32ASection 80Section 80JSection 80J(1)Section 80J(4)(iii)Section 80J(6)

80J.(1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking or a ship or the business of a hotel, to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction from

COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE vs. VENKATESHWARA HATCHERIES

C.A. No.-005066-005066 - 1996Supreme Court24 Mar 1999
For Respondent: VENKATESWARA HATCHERIES (P) LTD
Section 256(2)Section 32ASection 32A(2)Section 43ASection 80J(4)(iii)Section 88J

gains. Section 32A is one of the sections dealing with such deductions. Therefore, the income from poultry being outside the scope of total income by virtue of omitted Section 10(27) of the Act, there was no question for application of Sections 32A and 80J to them at least when we find that Section 80JJ was consciously simultaneously re-enacted

SHAH ORIGINALS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 24 MUMBAI

C.A. No.-002664-002664 - 2011Supreme Court21 Nov 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

Section 80

capital, and the gain from foreign exchange fluctuation comes within the permissible deduction of Section 80 HHC of the Act. He places strong reliance on Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta1 and Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd2. The Learned Counsel also places reliance on Commissioner of Income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Appeals are hereby dismissed

C.A. No.-013771-013771 - 2015Supreme Court06 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 260ASection 80

capital or revenue receipt. This additional issue has been raised in Civil Appeal No.9917 of 2017 (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Godawari Power and Ispat Pvt. Ltd.) and also in Civil Appeal No.8983 of 2017 (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Chhattisgarh Vs. M/s Godawari Power and Ispat Pvt. Ltd.) RECOMPUTATION OF DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION

BAJAJ TEMPO LTD. BOMBAY vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BOMBAY CITY-IIIBOMBAY

Accordingly succeed and are allowed

- 0Supreme Court24 Apr 1992
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BOMBAY CITY-IIIBOMBAY
Section 15Section 15C

gains derived from any industrial undertaking to which this section ap- plies as do not exceed six percent per annum on the capital employed in the undertaking, computed in accordance with such rules as may be made in the behalf by the Central Board of Revenue. (2) This section applies to any industrial under- taking which (i) is not formed

THE MAVILAYI SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT

C.A. No.-007343-007350 - 2019Supreme Court12 Jan 2021

Bench: Us, The Assessing Officer Denied Their Claims For Deduction, Relying Upon Section 80P(4) Of The It Act, Holding That As Per The Audited Receipt & 2

Section 147Section 19Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

80J and section 80JJ. (4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,— (a) “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned

CAMBAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT-IIAHMEDABAD (AND VI

In the result the assessee’s appeal also fails and the same

- 0Supreme Court11 Apr 1978
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT-IIAHMEDABAD (AND VIC
Section 263Section 41(2)Section 80ESection 80E(1)

80J. Since the expression of wider import, namely, "attributable to" has been used, the legislature intended to cover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity. [669 G-H] 2. (a) The High Court was right in deducting unabsorbed depreciation and development rebate aggregating to Rs. 2,54,613 from