BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 583(4)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai127Delhi108Karnataka103Agra62Cochin61Bangalore56Kolkata35Ahmedabad29Chandigarh24Pune18Hyderabad17Chennai12Jaipur10Indore4Rajkot3SC3Panaji3Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Patna2Telangana2Rajasthan1Guwahati1Dehradun1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 807Section 260A5Section 323Section 583(4)(a)2Capital Gains2

VATSALA SHENOY vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-001234-001234 - 2012Supreme Court18 Oct 2016
Section 260Section 583(4)(a)

Section 583(4)(a) thereof. The said petition was registered as Company Petition No. 1 of 1988. Significantly, though the firm stood dissolved on December 06, 1987, and thereafter Company Petition No. 1 of 1988 for the winding up proceedings after dissolution was filed in the High Court, the business of the partnership firm continued because of the interim order

M. JANARDHANA RAO vs. JT. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs

C.A. No.-004232-004232 - 2003Supreme Court28 Jan 2005
For Respondent: Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Section 260A
Section 50B
Section 583(4)(a)

capital gain. The assets of the firms were sold pursuant to an order passed by the High Court by invoking provisions of Section 583(4

PLASTIBLENDS INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 8(2) MUMBAI

C.A. No.-000238-000238 - 2012Supreme Court09 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 143(1)(a)Section 32Section 80

583/-. Though, the assessee had disclaimed deduction in respect of depreciation, the AO allowed deduction on this account as well in respect of the same in the sum of Rs.2,13,89,379/- while computing the profit and gains of business. After reducing the gross total income by the brought forward loss of Rs.98,47,170/-, he determined the business