BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 253(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai232Delhi204Ahmedabad77Chennai58Jaipur51Bangalore37Chandigarh33Indore32Kolkata27Lucknow25Hyderabad17Ranchi15Panaji13Nagpur12Raipur11Surat11Guwahati10Amritsar8SC8Rajkot8Pune7Cochin6Varanasi5Agra4Patna4Allahabad3Cuttack2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 115J4Section 804Section 80V2Section 332Section 812Section 452Capital Gains2Deduction2Depreciation2Exemption

RAJ PAL SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HARYANA

In the result, this appeal fails and is, therefore, dismissed

C.A. No.-002416-002416 - 2010Supreme Court25 Aug 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 256(1)Section 4Section 45Section 6

C’ Ward, Ambala. 14. Having noticed the relevant facts concerning acquisition of the land in question, the award of compensation for such acquisition and enhancement of the amount of compensation as also the first round of proceedings for assessment for the assessment year 1971-1972, we may now take note of the orders passed in the second round of proceedings

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) vs. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

C.A. No.-000262-000262 - 2026Supreme Court
2
Addition to Income2
15 Jan 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

1 All ER 865 (HL)] enunciated the look at test. According to that test, the task of the Revenue is to ascertain the legal nature of the transaction and, while doing so, it has to look at the entire transaction holistically and not to adopt a dissecting approach. 97. One more aspect needs to be reiterated. There is a conceptual

MISS DHUN DADABHOY KAPADIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

- 0Supreme Court31 Oct 1966
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
Section 12BSection 66A(2)

C. Mathur, for interveners. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bhargava, J. This appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Bombay under section 66A(2) of the Indian Income- tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is directed against the answer returned by the High Court to the following question referred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

C.A. No.-021762-021762 - 2017Supreme Court19 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 12AA(1) of the IT Act, on 18.05.1979 and is engaged in the activity of promotion of the export of all kind of ready-made garments, knitwear, and garments made of leather, jute and hemp. It does not per se engage in any activity for profit, and its mandate is to ensure that Indian apparel manufacturers, are given forums

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

The appeals are allowed and the

C.A. No.-005420-005423 - 2002Supreme Court10 Apr 2008
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax,Trivandrum
Section 115JSection 33Section 80Section 80V

c) the amount or amounts set aside to provisions made for meeting liabilities other than ascertained liabilities; or (d) the amount by way of provision for losses of subsidiary companies; or (e) the amount or amounts of dividends paid or proposed; or (f) the amount or amounts of expenditure relatable to any income to which any of the provisions

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY vs. H. HOLCK LARSEN

- 0Supreme Court08 May 1986
For Respondent: H. HOLCK LARSEN
Section 81

1) of the Act of 1922 equivalent to section 256 of the Act of 1961 was lid ted to entertaining references involving questions of law. If the point raised on reference related to the construction of a document of title or to the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the statute, it is a pure question

PINGLE INDUSTRIES LTD., SECUNDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal fails, and will be dismissed with

- 0Supreme Court26 Apr 1960
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD

section reads as follows: " 12 (1). The tax shall be payable by an assessee under the head profits and gains of business, profession or vocation in respect of the profits and gains of any business, profession or vocation carried or by him. (2) Such profits or gains shall be computed after making the following allowances, namely:- ...................................................... (XV) Any expenditure

M/S. SAHNEY STEEL & PRESS WORKS LTD. HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.ANDHRA PRADESH-I , HYDERABAD

- 0Supreme Court19 Sept 1997
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.ANDHRA PRADESH-I , HYDERABAD

c) Exemption from payment of water rate on water drawn from sources not maintained at the cost of Government or any local body; (d) Refund of water rate in respect of water drawn from a http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 10 Government source or from a source maintained by any local body but returned purified