N. BAGAVATHY AMMAL vs. COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI

gains and subjected to tax. The assessees’ appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were allowed by holding that the scope of Section 46(2) would have to be read in the light of the definition of the word ’capital asset’ in Section 2(14

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) DELHI vs. HARPRASAD & CO. (P) LTD

In the result, the appeal is accepted with costs

section (6C) of s. 2, only if they were chargeable under s. 12B. As noticed already, s.12B as modified by the Finance Act, 1949, did not charge any ’capital gains’ arising between 1-4-1948 to 14

VATSALA SHENOY vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2(14) of the Act. It is not even disputed. Once it is held to be the “capital asset”, gain Page 22 JUDGMENT 22 therefrom is to be treated as capital gain within the meaning of Section

M.S.P. NADAR SONS, VIRUDHU NAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), MADRAS

2. The deductions provided by Section 80-T have to be applied to the " capital gains" arising from sale of long term capital assets. In other words, the deductions provided by the said section have to be applied to the amount representing the capital gains during the relevant previous year. The amount of capital gains during the relevant previous year

M/S FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD BANGALOARE vs. CIT BANGALORE

2) The amount of capital gain which is not appropriated by the assessee towards the cost and expenses incurred in relation to all or any of the purposes mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) of sub- section (1) within one year before the date on which the transfer of the original asset took place, or which is not utilised

M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

14) excludes stock-in-trade from the definition of a capital asset, while Section 2(47) defines “transfer” only in relation to capital assets. Section 28 casts a wide net, taxing the “profits and gains

SEDCO FOREX INTERNATIONAL INC. THR. ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR. NAVIN SARDA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MEERUT

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

14 SCC 732 11 (1972) 4 SCC 426 28 the parties on both sides, it would be apposite to go into the raison d’etre behind the orders of the ITAT as well as the High Court. 30) The ITAT in its order has taken note of the relevant clauses of the agreements entered into between ONGC and assessee (Sedco

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) vs. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

Section 197 certification process, had concluded that the question of chargeability of capital gains and the identification of the beneficial owner, upon piercing the corporate veil, had already been determined. In light of the same, and in the absence of any change in factual circumstances, the CIT had urged the AAR to reject the applications made by the respondents

NAVIN JINDAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

capital loss of Rs.2,43,750/-, which occurred to the assessee on sale of right to subscribe to PCDs. The long-term gain, which accrued to the assessee on sale of shares of JSL and SPL, came to Rs.23,18,200/- to which Section 48(2) is applied by the assessee. On application of Section 48(2), the standard deduction

THE MAVILAYI SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT

Bench: Us, The Assessing Officer Denied Their Claims For Deduction, Relying Upon Section 80P(4) Of The It Act, Holding That As Per The Audited Receipt & 2

14 such society to carry out its main objects from year to year, and if does not do so, it would be disentitled to any deduction under Section 80P(4). He further argued, relying upon judgments of this Court, that the burden is on the assessee to establish by facts, in every assessment year, that it is entitled

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX 4 BENGALURU 2 vs. M/S JUPITER CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

2(47) of the Act. Relinquishment of the asset or the extinguishment of any right in it, which may not amount to sale, can also be considered as a transfer and any profit or gain which arises from the transfer of a capital asset is liable to be taxed under Section 45 of the Act. 12. When as a result

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 12AA(1) of the IT Act, on 18.05.1979 and is engaged in the activity of promotion of the export of all kind of ready-made garments, knitwear, and garments made of leather, jute and hemp. It does not per se engage in any activity for profit, and its mandate is to ensure that Indian apparel manufacturers, are given forums

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MEERUT, ETC. ETC. vs. M/S VIRMANI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, ETC. ETC

Appeal is allowed accordingly

capital expenditure on scientific research, the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 72 shall apply in relation to speculation business as they apply in relation to any other business." We may first consider the meaning of the expression "profits or gains chargeable". On first impression, the said expression appears to refer only to profits or gains of business

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADHYA PRADESH, BHOPAL vs. H.H. MAHARANI USHA DEVI

capital gains. This contention was negatived by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, framed the following question for reference before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under Section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961: " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the heirloom jewellery constituted ’personal effects’ within the meaning of Section 2(14

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. D.P. SANDU BROS CHEMBUR (P) LTD

2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of inter-alia a tenancy right would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains was met. In other words the cost of acquisition would be taken as determinable but the rate would

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BALBIR SINGH MAINI

The appeals are dismissed with no order as to

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

capital gains’. According to the learned counsel, the present case is squarely covered by Section 2(47)(v) as Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is applicable to the transaction under the JDA. According to the learned counsel, the transferee in the present case has, as part performance of the contract, taken possession of the entire property

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI vs. M/S ELI LILLY & COMPANY (INDIA) P.LTD

2). Therefore, if a sum that is to be paid to the non-resident is chargeable to tax, tax is required 30 to be deducted. The sum which is to be paid may be income out of different heads of income mentioned in Section 14, that is to say, income from salaries, income from house property, profits and gains

R & B FALCON (A) PTY LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed to the above extent

capitalized or not. However, the same expenditure will not be liable to FBT again in the year in which it is amortized and charged to profit. Is FBT payable by an Indian Company having employees based both in and outside India on its total (global) expenditure incurred by it for the purposes referred to in clauses