BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai920Delhi519Jaipur195Ahmedabad116Karnataka105Kolkata94Bangalore86Chennai71Surat68Indore67Pune50Hyderabad39Chandigarh37Calcutta37Rajkot36Raipur33Allahabad20Nagpur20Amritsar18Guwahati16Lucknow16Cuttack5Visakhapatnam4Jodhpur3Agra3Ranchi2Cochin2SC2Panaji1Patna1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 684Section 260A2Penalty2

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I

C.A. No.-007115-007115 - 2005Supreme Court06 Feb 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I
Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

purchase and lease of cinematographic films held to be bogus Rs. 57,51,520.00 (ii) Reduction of claim of depreciation in respect of leasing vehicles from 40% to 20%. Rs. 10,28,462.00 (iii) Unexplained share application money added back as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 Rs. 19,16,000.00 (iv) Lease rentals of cinematographic films held

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-006110-006110 - 2009Supreme Court24 Apr 2020

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Bench:
Section 143(2)Section 24(1)Section 260ASection 272(1)(c)Section 68

b)  fails to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under sub­section (1) of section 142 or fails   to   comply   with   a   direction   issued   under sub­section (2A) of that section, or (c) having made a return, fails to comply with all the   terms   of   a   notice   issued   under   sub­ section (2) of section 143, the Assessing   Officer,   after