BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,454Delhi624Jaipur211Ahmedabad160Kolkata111Karnataka106Bangalore93Surat87Indore83Chennai82Pune77Raipur40Hyderabad40Chandigarh38Calcutta37Rajkot37Amritsar27Nagpur23Allahabad20Guwahati18Lucknow17Agra10Jodhpur9Cuttack5Visakhapatnam4Patna4SC2Cochin2Telangana2Ranchi2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Panaji1Jabalpur1Gauhati1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 684Section 260A2Penalty2

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I

C.A. No.-007115-007115 - 2005Supreme Court06 Feb 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I
Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

purchase and lease of cinematographic films held to be bogus Rs. 57,51,520.00 (ii) Reduction of claim of depreciation in respect of leasing vehicles from 40% to 20%. Rs. 10,28,462.00 (iii) Unexplained share application money added back as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 Rs. 19,16,000.00 (iv) Lease rentals of cinematographic films held

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-006110-006110 - 2009Supreme Court24 Apr 2020

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Bench:
Section 143(2)Section 24(1)Section 260ASection 272(1)(c)Section 68

purchases by the appellant/assessee from unregistered dealers were   bogus   entries   effected   by   the   appellant/assessee. Resultantly,   the   penalty   proceedings   under   Section   271