Search: bogus purchases

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 2(15)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 685 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 260A3 Section 1483 Section 803 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Depreciation2 Deduction

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-006110-006110 - 2009Supreme Court24 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Section 143(2)Section 24(1)Section 260ASection 272(1)(c)Section 68

15 persons is held as unexplained under Section 68 and added in declared income of assessee. Accordingly, the computation of income of assessee for assessment year 199899 is as follows: 3 Income shown in the Returns 87500/ 1. Disallowed deduction U/s.24(1) as per discussion 7200/ 2. Additions in gross profit 10000/ 3. Additions on the basis of less Household

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Appeals are hereby dismissed

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) vs. M/S. AAFLOAT TEXTILES (I) P.LTD.&ORS

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 1 vs. NRA IRON AND STEEL PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I