BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 142clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai631Delhi483Jaipur246Kolkata210Chennai119Chandigarh115Ahmedabad106Rajkot89Bangalore86Surat73Pune59Cochin58Indore58Visakhapatnam57Raipur53Hyderabad47Amritsar40Guwahati33Lucknow27Agra25Allahabad25Patna25Nagpur20Jodhpur20Ranchi12Varanasi7Jabalpur5SC4Dehradun3Cuttack3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 684Section 260A3Section 803Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Depreciation2Penalty2Deduction2

BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-006110-006110 - 2009Supreme Court24 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Section 143(2)Section 24(1)Section 260ASection 272(1)(c)Section 68

142   has   been   issued   prior   to   the   making   of   an assessment under this section. (2) The provisions of this section as they stood immediately before   their   amendment   by   the   Direct   Tax   Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 (4 of 1988), shall apply to and in relation   to   any   assessment   for   the   assessment   year commencing on the 1st day of April

NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-001008-001008 - 2020
Supreme Court
03 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 148

142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment for that assessment year: Provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply in a case where any income in relation to any asset (including   financial   interest   in   any   entity)   located   outside India,   chargeable   to   tax,   has   escaped   assessment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Appeals are hereby dismissed

C.A. No.-013771-013771 - 2015Supreme Court06 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 260ASection 80

142 (1) of the Act were issued calling upon the assessee to furnish details for clarification which were complied with by the assessee. During the assessment proceedings, the issue relating to deduction under Section 80 IA of the Act came up for consideration. Assessee had claimed deduction under the said 6 provision of a sum amounting to Rs.80

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I

C.A. No.-007115-007115 - 2005Supreme Court06 Feb 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I
Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

purchase and lease of cinematographic films held to be bogus Rs. 57,51,520.00 (ii) Reduction of claim of depreciation in respect of leasing vehicles from 40% to 20%. Rs. 10,28,462.00 (iii) Unexplained share application money added back as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 Rs. 19,16,000.00 (iv) Lease rentals of cinematographic films held