Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 254(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115J6 Section 804 Section 2014 Section 254(2)4 Section 194C3 Section 80V2 Section 332 Double Taxation/DTAA2 TDS2 Rectification u/s 154

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI vs. TULSYAN NEC LTD

C.A. No.-010677-010679 - 2010Supreme Court16 Dec 2010

Section 115J

254, section 260, section 262, section 263 or section 264, the amount of tax payable under this Act is reduced or increased, as the case may be, the amount of tax credit allowed under this section shall also be increased or reduced accordingly.” 9 5. As per provisions of Section 115JA, a company is liable

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT)4 vs. M/S. RELIANCE TELECOM LTD

C.A. No.-007110-007110 - 2021Supreme Court03 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 195(2)Section 254(2)Section 9(1)(vi)

1 Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2021.12.03 15:43:56 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Revenue’) and has confirmed the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ITAT’) dated 18.11.2016 passed in Miscellaneous Application Nos. 261/M/2014 and 419/M/2013, by which the ITAT in exercise

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI vs. TULSYAN NEC LTD

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT)4 vs. M/S. RELIANCE TELECOM LTD

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI vs. TULSYAN NEC LTD

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT)4 vs. M/S. RELIANCE TELECOM LTD

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) vs. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

M/S. HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVREGE P.LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX