BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 2(14)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,368Delhi1,332Hyderabad276Chennai275Bangalore262Ahmedabad204Jaipur172Chandigarh148Kolkata130Indore112Pune98Rajkot90Cochin87Surat67Raipur37Visakhapatnam36Nagpur35Lucknow26Jodhpur23Cuttack21Dehradun20Guwahati20Amritsar18Agra18Patna6Varanasi6Allahabad3Panaji3Ranchi2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Transfer Pricing2

TATA CUMMINS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE-1-JAMSHEDPUR AND THE ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, NFAC, DELHI, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 430/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaytata Cummins Private Limited, D.C.I.T., Cummins India Office, Tower-A, 7Th Circle-1, Vs. Floor, Survey No. 21, Balewadi, Pune, Jamshedpur. Maharashtra. Pan No. Aaact 6353 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

2 Tata Cummins Vs DCIT 72.5 kVA to 100 kVA range. Thus, a single engine technological input was put to numerous uses through R&D efforts. 9.4 Subsequent periods saw rapid changes in environmental / emission norms putting a serious demand on R&D. By 2005, the Assessee's R&D was involved in adapting Base six cylinder 613 5.9 litres

TIMKEN INDIA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 92/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Bench:
For Appellant: S/Shri K.M.Gupta/Krishan Shaw, ARsFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 14ASection 234D

2 | 31 Assessment Year : 2017-18 Pvt. Ltd., [2023] 149 taxmann.com 332 (Mumbai – Trib.) (SB). In the said decision, the Special Bench has categorically held in para 79 to 83 as follows: “79. As we have discussed earlier, the purpose of DTAA is to avoid double taxation/allocation of taxing rights between two Sovereign nations. When we hold that