M/S USHA MARTIN LTD,KOLKATA vs. ACIT CIR-3, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

transfer pricing, it was submitted that the assessee is in the business of manufacture of steel wire, steel ropes, wire rods, billets, wires, and other steel products etc. It was the submission that the products manufactured by the assessee was in the realm of steel. The assessee had provided its TNMM calculation and had given multiple

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY,DHANBAD vs. PR. CIT, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

12,37,58,750.43 for 2 Ashok Kr. Pandey Vs PCIT the financial year under consideration and when asked to explain the reasons for high closing stocks, the learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submitted on 16/02/2019 that during relevant financial year, some projects were completed and most of the projects were shown under 'work in progress' since

SUDHIR KUMAR JHA,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ACIT OR DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

price. He has also sold paddy in 2012 to\ngovernment agencies and has received payment through cheque. A perusal\nof the details of the land sold as has been provided by Shri Sunil Kumar\nJha along with a certificate shows that the land was sold between\n08.12.2010 and 19.12.2016. The certificate issued by Shri Sunil Kumar\nJha says that