M/S ADITYA BIRLA CHEMICALS INDIA LTD.,PALAMAU vs. ACIT, RANCHI

In the result, Assessee`s appeals are allowed and Revenue`s appeals are dismissed and cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed to the extent indicated above

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos. 125 To 127/Ran/2015 Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Aditya Birla Chemicals India Vs. Acit, Circle – 1, Ltd. (Formerly Known As Bihar Ranchi Caustic & Chemicals Ltd.) Rehla, Palamau – 822124. Pan/Gir No. : Aaacb 7747 A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

exempt plant of the assessee. Ld CIT DR also submitted that the CIT(A) on one hand while deciding the issue of expenses allowable of the power plant unit has held that no expenses which are remotely or directly related to power plant unit like corporate office expenses, common head office expenses etc can be taken into consideration

M/S ADITYA BIRLA CHEMICALS INDIA LTD.,PALAMAU vs. ACIT, RANCHI

In the result, Assessee`s appeals are allowed and Revenue`s appeals are dismissed and cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed to the extent indicated above

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos. 125 To 127/Ran/2015 Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Aditya Birla Chemicals India Vs. Acit, Circle – 1, Ltd. (Formerly Known As Bihar Ranchi Caustic & Chemicals Ltd.) Rehla, Palamau – 822124. Pan/Gir No. : Aaacb 7747 A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

exempt plant of the assessee. Ld CIT DR also submitted that the CIT(A) on one hand while deciding the issue of expenses allowable of the power plant unit has held that no expenses which are remotely or directly related to power plant unit like corporate office expenses, common head office expenses etc can be taken into consideration

M/S ADITYA BIRLA CHEMICALS INDIA LTD.,PALAMAU vs. ACIT, RANCHI

In the result, Assessee`s appeals are allowed and Revenue`s appeals are dismissed and cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed to the extent indicated above

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos. 125 To 127/Ran/2015 Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Aditya Birla Chemicals India Vs. Acit, Circle – 1, Ltd. (Formerly Known As Bihar Ranchi Caustic & Chemicals Ltd.) Rehla, Palamau – 822124. Pan/Gir No. : Aaacb 7747 A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

exempt plant of the assessee. Ld CIT DR also submitted that the CIT(A) on one hand while deciding the issue of expenses allowable of the power plant unit has held that no expenses which are remotely or directly related to power plant unit like corporate office expenses, common head office expenses etc can be taken into consideration

ACIT, RANCHI vs. M/S M/S ADITYA BIRLA CHEMICALS INDIA LTD., PALAMAU

In the result, Assessee`s appeals are allowed and Revenue`s appeals are dismissed and cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed to the extent indicated above

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos. 125 To 127/Ran/2015 Assessment Years: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Aditya Birla Chemicals India Vs. Acit, Circle – 1, Ltd. (Formerly Known As Bihar Ranchi Caustic & Chemicals Ltd.) Rehla, Palamau – 822124. Pan/Gir No. : Aaacb 7747 A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

exempt plant of the assessee. Ld CIT DR also submitted that the CIT(A) on one hand while deciding the issue of expenses allowable of the power plant unit has held that no expenses which are remotely or directly related to power plant unit like corporate office expenses, common head office expenses etc can be taken into consideration

TIMKEN INDIA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

transfer pricing is in regard to whetherthe resale price method is to be applied or TNMM method is to be applied. The resale method admittedly has been applies where the assessee purchase of particular product when sale it. The profit margin should be comparable. Now what the assessee purchases is bearing. These bearings are purchased at the instance

ASHOK BEHL,RANCHI vs. ITO,WARD-1(1), RANCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Ashok Behl Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), Ranchi 1St Floor, Samridhi Complex, South Office Para, Doranda, Ranchi – 834001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Adwpb2438E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""थ" / Respondent)

price paid or promised or part-paid and part-promised. (ii) Such transfer, in the case of tangible immoveable property or in the case of reversion or other intangible thing, can be made only by a registered instrument. (iii) Delivery of tangible immoveable property takes place when the seller places the buyer, or such person as he directs, in possession

SUNITA ADUKIA,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-2, RANCHI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

price. (iv) For that the order passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, treating the Long Term Capital Gains as Short Term Capital Gain is bad in law as well as in facts and against the Principles of natural justice and therefore liable to be set aside. P a g e 2 | 17 ITA No.14 & 15/Ran/2018 Assessment

SUDHIR KUMAR JHA,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ACIT OR DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

exemption limit for filing income\nand total\nnet\nincome\n4.\ntax\nreturn. Copy of PAN enclosed as Annexure-2. Land ownership certicale for some larids\nin village Bardaha from anchal karyalaya is attached as Annexure -3.\n5.\nMostly I am doing sale of agricultural proceeds paddy and wheat in cash to have better price\nand ease of sale However