BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “section 68”+ Section 69Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur103Delhi93Mumbai71Chandigarh43Bangalore38Indore38Surat36Pune27Hyderabad22Rajkot22Chennai21Kolkata17Cochin16Ahmedabad14Amritsar13Ranchi11Raipur9Jodhpur6Lucknow5Cuttack5Visakhapatnam4Guwahati3Patna3Nagpur3Panaji2Jabalpur2Allahabad1SC1Kerala1Varanasi1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)17Section 115B15Section 6812Section 143(3)11Section 132(4)11Business Income11Addition to Income11Section 13210Unexplained Cash Credit10

SANGITA DEVI SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C.C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 421/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

HARISH KUMAR SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C.C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Unexplained Investment10
Undisclosed Income10
ITA 425/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

PARAS KUMAR SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C. C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 420/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

MANJU DEVI SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 82/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

SANTOSH KUMAR SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C. C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 426/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

AAKRITI SARAWGI,,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 83/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

SAMIR KUMAR SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C. C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 423/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

SUNILA DEVI SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C. C. , DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 427/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

RAJESH BADRI PD. MODI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 418/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

KANTA DEVI SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C.C., DHANBAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 422/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

sections 68, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and reflected in the return of income under Section 139 of the Act. Secondly

SANDEEP KUMAR SARAWGI,GIRIDIH vs. ACIT, C.C., DHANBAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 419/RAN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaysandeep Kumar Sarawgi, A.C.I.T., Sarawgi Sadan, Dumri Road, Central Circle, Vs. Giridih-815301 (Jharkhand) Dhanbad. Pan No. Aejps 2820 M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

68 or 69A, 69B, 69C and 69D only a presumption has been drawn by the Assessing Officer and the provisions of section