BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

42 results for “section 68”+ Section 67clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,380Mumbai2,586Bangalore994Chennai743Karnataka664Ahmedabad664Hyderabad551Jaipur528Kolkata508Surat312Indore307Chandigarh278Pune277Cochin229Raipur117Visakhapatnam110Cuttack109Rajkot102Telangana90Lucknow72Amritsar70Calcutta68Nagpur63Jabalpur59Agra55SC47Allahabad45Ranchi42Jodhpur30Guwahati26Dehradun21Patna18Varanasi13Rajasthan8Orissa7Panaji4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2Uttarakhand2Kerala2Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Disallowance37Depreciation33Section 14A29Section 35E26Section 234A26Addition to Income24Section 32(2)21Section 143(3)15Section 688Section 271(1)(c)

ACIT,CIRCLE-2(1), HAZARIBAG vs. SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY, HAZARIBAG

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 94/RAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

67,558/- whereas the AO has wrongly stated as Rs. 46,86,305/-. (ii) It is stated that the provisions of section 68

GOLDEN GOENKA COMMERCE PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2(1),, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 11/RAN/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi

Showing 1–20 of 42 · Page 1 of 3

6
Set Off of Losses5
Carry Forward of Losses5
10 Oct 2025
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.11/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Golden Goenka Commerce Pvt. Ltd. (Earlier Known As Rajgaj Traders Pvt. Ltd.)............................……….……Appellant 25A, S.P Mukherjee Road, 4Th Floor, Bhawanipore, Kol-25, [Pan: Aabcr7503F] Vs. Acit, Circle-2(1), Jamshedpur..…..….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Kumar Pranab, Cit- Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 4, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 10, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [“Cit(A)”], Dated 21.12.2018, Arising Out Of Assessment Framed Under Section 147 Read With Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (The “Act”) For The Assessment Year 2011–12. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Multiple Grounds, The Sum & Substance Of Which Is That The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Upholding The Addition Of ₹4,73,00,000 Made By The Assessing Officer (“Ao”) Under Section 68 Of The Act Towards Share Capital & Share Premium, Ignoring The Documentary Evidences Placed On Record & Without Conducting Any Independent Enquiry. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Filed Its Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2011–12 Declaring Total Income Of ₹16,67,088. Subsequently, The Case Of The Assessee Was Reopened

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

section 68 of the Act towards share capital and share premium, ignoring the documentary evidences placed on record, and without conducting any independent enquiry. 3. Brief Facts of the case are that the assessee company filed its return of income for the assessment year 2011–12 declaring total income of ₹16,67

RAMESH KESHRI,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD W2(3), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 36/RAN/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi04 Feb 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryramesh Keshri, I.T.O., Near Suzuki Showroom, Piska More, Ward 2(3), Vs. Ranchi-834005 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aftpk 1039 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 44A

68,850/- (profit already shown by the assessee as per Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961) which comes to Rs. 34,83,349/-, this is the total addition made by the Assessing Officer for which the tax effect is Rs. 13,67

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI vs. SHRI KAMAL BHUSHAN, RANCHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue and the cross-objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 8/RAN/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi15 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma] I.T.(Ss)A. No. 1/Ran/2021 I.T.(Ss)A. No. 5/Ran/2019

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 37(1)Section 68Section 69C

section 68 which has been cross checked with the details submitted in the paper book and as such. It is also observed that the assessing officer at time of assessment has failed to look into the submissions of the appellant and for that matter give any categorical finding for making the addition as from the order of assessment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DHANBAD vs. BINDHYAVASINI COMMERCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, DHANBAD

ITA 240/RAN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi22 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.240/Ran/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Acit, Central Circle, Dhanbad.….……………............................……….……Appellant Vs. Bindhyavasini Commercial Services Pvt. Ltd….........……........……...…..…..Respondent House No.41, Premises Of Punj Kumar Singh, Near Suraksha Clinic, Hetli Bandh, Jharia, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 828111. [Pan: Aaecb0160D] Appearances By: Shri Manish Tiwari, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Kanhaiya Lal Kanak, Cit Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 10, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 22, 2025

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

section 68 of the Act; I.T.A. No.240/Ran/2023 Bindhyavasini Commercial Services Pvt. Ltd vi. Evidence in form of sale bill, investments list, Bank A/c details, Name, address, PAN of 8 entities from whom Amarendra Financial Pvt. Ltd. received money 5.2 He stated that from the above documents, it is clear that the assessee as well as the share applicant

DCIT,CIRCLE-1,RANCHI, RANCHI vs. CENTRAL COALFIELD LTD, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 206/RAN/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayd.C.I.T., Central Coalfield Ltd., Circle-1, 4Th Floor, Central Revenue Building Vs. Ranchi. Annexee, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee M/S Central Coalfields Ltd., D.C.I.T., Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, Circle-1, Vs. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40

67,000/- Total Additions/Disallowances ₹ 2,06,13,64,500/- The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act were separately initiated with the issue of notice under Section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Act and finally, the Assessing Officer vide the impugned penalty order imposed a penalty of ₹ 69,68

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 209/RAN/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayd.C.I.T., Central Coalfield Ltd., Circle-1, 4Th Floor, Central Revenue Building Vs. Ranchi. Annexee, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee M/S Central Coalfields Ltd., D.C.I.T., Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, Circle-1, Vs. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40

67,000/- Total Additions/Disallowances ₹ 2,06,13,64,500/- The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act were separately initiated with the issue of notice under Section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Act and finally, the Assessing Officer vide the impugned penalty order imposed a penalty of ₹ 69,68

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR01 , RANCHI

ITA 168/RAN/2017[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n56,93,18,000\n47,39,30,000\n3,06,00,000\n14,65,00,000\n51,68

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 176/RAN/2017[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

ITA 165/RAN/2017[07-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

ITA 37/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6.\nLand & Crop\n7.\nMines Development Exp\n8.\nCMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9.\nIICM Expenses\n10\nMines Closure Expenses

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

ITA 167/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

ITA 166/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000\n21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 174/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000\n21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 173/RAN/2017[07-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

ITA 32/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

ITA 74/RAN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000 21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

ITA 266/RAN/2017[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n56,93,18,000\n47,39,30,000\nBy Deptt.\n22,25,826\nWrongly taken\n1,05,13,00,000\nBy Deptt.\n3,06,00,000\n17,57,00,000\n51,68,00,000\n1,00,35,00,000\nBy Deptt

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

ITA 178/RAN/2017[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

67,32,000\n14,65,00,000\n17,57,00,000\n21,05,00,000\n22,99,00,000\n6. Land & Crop\n7. Mines Development Exp\n8. CMPDIL Expenses\n56,93,18,000\n51,68,00,000\n49,38\n9,38,00,000\n36,53,00,000\n21,22,00,000\n9. IICM Expenses\n10 Mines Closure Expenses

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

67,000/- and\nclaimed the same as exempt u/s 10(34) of the Act. Ld. AO on perusal\nof the profit and loss accounts and books of accounts came to the\nconclusion that provisions of Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D of\nthe Rules were applicable on the assessee and after giving a show\ncause computed