M/S MANIKARAN POWER LTD,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayit(Ss)A No. 01/Ran/2025 (Assessment Year: 2022-23) A.C.I.T., Manikaran Power Limited, Central Circle-2, Manikaran Tower, Kilburn Colony, Vs. Ranchi. P.O. Hinoo, Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) J.C.I.T. (In Situ), Pan No. Aaecm 4555 F Ranchi. Revenue/ Appellant Respondent/ Assessee Manikaran Power Limited, A.C.I.T., Manikaran Tower, Kilburn Colony, Central Circle-2, Vs. P.O. Hinoo, Ranchi-834002 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaecm 4555 F Revenue/ Appellant Respondent/ Assessee

Section 68 of the Act which specifically refers to unexplained cash credits. It was a further submission that in respect of the expenses paid and claimed as rental expenditure to an extent of ₹ 57,00,000/- and ₹ 36

KAUSHAL JAIN,RANCHI vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Kaushal Jain, I.T.O., Radheshyam Garage Lane, Old Ward 1(5), Vs. Commissioner Compound, Ranchi. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Afgpj 0706 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) on the ground that the assessee failed to explain the cash deposits of ₹ 52,16,169/-. The Assessing Officer in the assessment order has also given the basis on which the addition was made by providing a table in the assessment order in paragraph

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI vs. M/S A.K.TRANSPORT, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am& Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm]

section 68 is not applicable to the addition made on account of sundry creditors by the Assessing Officer. 3. The facts in brief are that during the assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer noted that there were huge sundry creditors amounting to Rs.4,36

ACIT, CIRCLE-3, RANCHI vs. SHRI SUMIT RAMSISARIA, RANCHI

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godara

section 68 of the Act. In view of above we find no reason to interfere in the order of ld. CIT(A). Hence this ground of Revenue is dismissed.” ITA No.222/R/2019 & C.O.12/R/2019 A.Y. 2014-15 ACIT, Cir-3,RAN Vs. Sh Sumit Ramsisaria Page 13 We accordingly find no reason to accept Revenue’s arguments seeking to revive

ACIT CIRCLE-1, DHANBAD vs. SRI VIKASH AGARWAL, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 68 of the IT Act, 1961. (iv) Whether the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in facts while deleting the additions amounting to Rs.36, 10,000/- stating the fact that out of the unsecured loan of Rs. 36

RAMESH KESHRI,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD W2(3), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryramesh Keshri, I.T.O., Near Suzuki Showroom, Piska More, Ward 2(3), Vs. Ranchi-834005 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aftpk 1039 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

36%, less Rs. 1,68,850/- (profit already shown by the assessee as per Section 44AD of the Income

JOKHIRAM DURGADUTT,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayjokhiram Durgadutt, D.C.I.T., 9, J.D. Corporate, Behind J.D. High Circle-1, Vs. Street, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aabfj 2200 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) on 28/12/2018 by making addition of Rs. 68,36

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI vs. SHRI KAMAL BHUSHAN, RANCHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue and the cross-objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma] I.T.(Ss)A. No. 1/Ran/2021 I.T.(Ss)A. No. 5/Ran/2019

section 68 which has been cross checked with the details submitted in the paper book and as such. It is also observed that the assessing officer at time of assessment has failed to look into the submissions of the appellant and for that matter give any categorical finding for making the addition as from the order of assessment

MAA CHINNA CEMENT & ISPAT (P) LTD,HAZARIBAGH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiरोक आवेदन (S.A. No.01/Ran/2020 (Arising Out Ita No.203/Ran/2019) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:-2015-16

68,227/- 2. We find during the course of hearing that these entities are part of “Rungta” group only and this clinching fact has gone unrebetted from the Revenue side. Couple with this, there is further no quarrel that all the relevant notice(s) issued u/s 133(6) of the Act stood duly received / replied from these group entities’ side

DCIT,CIRCLE-1,RANCHI, RANCHI vs. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Central Coalfields Ltd., D.C.I.T., Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, Circle-1, Vs. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue D.C.I.T., Central Coalfield Ltd., Circle-1, 4Th Floor, Central Revenue Building Vs. Ranchi. Annexee, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

36,000/- (iii) Grants to Sports & Grants to Schools ₹ 14,93,74,000/- M/s CCL Vs DCIT & 1 Anr. (iv) Community Development & Environmental ₹ 9,90,47,000/- Expenditure (v) Mines Closure Expenses ₹ 22,72,13,000/- (vi) CMPDIL expenses ₹ 43,53,60,000/- (viii) IICM Charges ₹ 2,35,40,000/- Total Additions/Disallowances ₹ 97,77,17,000/- The penalty proceedings under

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue\nis dismissed

36,000/-\n(iii) Grants to Sports & Grants to Schools\n* 14,93,74,000/-\n(iv) Community Development & Environmental\n9,90,47,000/-\nExpenditure\n(v) Mines Closure Expenses\n* 22,72,13,000/-\n(vi) CMPDIL expenses\n*43,53,60,000/-\n(viii) IICM Charges\n* 2,35,40,000/-\nTotal Additions/Disallowances

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR01 , RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13\nSiding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14\nMiscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15\nStriping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16\nCSR Expenses\nTotal

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

36,26,00,000\n13 Siding Maintenance Expenses\n22,87,00,000\n21,00,000\n23,22,00,000\n10,68,00,000\n14 Miscellaneous Expenses\n32,70,00,000\n18,48,00,000\n37,21,00,000\n31,69,00,000\n15 Striping Activity Adjustment\n56,90,00,000\n69,52,00,000\n16 CSR Expenses\nTotal