BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 202clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi586Karnataka494Mumbai412Bangalore128Ahmedabad119Chennai114Jaipur99Kolkata77Rajkot60Hyderabad48Chandigarh36Nagpur31Surat30Indore29Raipur28Pune28Lucknow19Cuttack17Calcutta16Telangana15Guwahati12Amritsar10Ranchi9Visakhapatnam8Jodhpur7SC5Rajasthan4Agra3Patna3Dehradun3Cochin2Allahabad2Orissa1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 32(2)16Section 143(3)15Section 40A(3)12Disallowance7Addition to Income5Section 14A4Depreciation4Set Off of Losses4Carry Forward of Losses4

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR vs. BENKO TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 436/RAN/2024[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.436/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Acit, Cc, Jamshedpur…………….…….…............................……….……Appellant Vs. Benko Traders Pvt. Ltd....………...….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent 119, 4Th Floor, Block D, White House, Park Stree, Wb – 700016. [Pan: Aabcb1888R] Appearances By: Shri Akshay Ringasia, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 07, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 17, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Patna For The Assessment Year 2015–16 Dated 25.09.2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (The ‘Act’). 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Under Section 139 Of The Act Declaring A Total Income As Nil. The Return Was Processed Under Section 143(1). Subsequently, The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & An Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Completed On 28.11.2017 Determining The Total Income At ₹9,88,28,406. Based On Information Received From The Investigation Wing, Mumbai, Relating To Alleged Use Of Stock Exchange Platform (Bse/Nse) For Generating Fictitious Long-Term/Short-Term Capital Gains Through Certain Scripts & Alleged Accommodation Entries, The Assessing Officer Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 Of The Act. A Notice Under Section 148 Was Issued The Assessee Filed Its Return Declaring The Same Income

Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(3)
Section 1473
Section 2633
Revision u/s 2633
Section 147
Section 148
Section 250
Section 68
Section 69C

section 68 of the Act, along with commission expenditure of ₹3,29,202 @2% under section 69C, and unsecured

M/S S.P ENTERPRISES,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 34/RAN/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi15 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

202 of 2008 is dismissed.” 4. We adopt the above detailed reasoning mutatis mutandis to delete the impugned sec. 40A(3) disallowance of Rs.69.91 lac. The assessee’s sole ground as well as its main appeal ITA 309/Ran/2016 succeeds. Its second appeal ITA No.310/Ran/2016 involves consequential penalty proceedings u/s 271E of the Act. The same is also accepted since

M/S S.P.ENTERPRISES,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO WARD-1(5), JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 310/RAN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi15 Feb 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

202 of 2008 is dismissed.” 4. We adopt the above detailed reasoning mutatis mutandis to delete the impugned sec. 40A(3) disallowance of Rs.69.91 lac. The assessee’s sole ground as well as its main appeal ITA 309/Ran/2016 succeeds. Its second appeal ITA No.310/Ran/2016 involves consequential penalty proceedings u/s 271E of the Act. The same is also accepted since

M/S S.P.ENTERPRISES,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO WARD-1(5), JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 309/RAN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi15 Feb 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

202 of 2008 is dismissed.” 4. We adopt the above detailed reasoning mutatis mutandis to delete the impugned sec. 40A(3) disallowance of Rs.69.91 lac. The assessee’s sole ground as well as its main appeal ITA 309/Ran/2016 succeeds. Its second appeal ITA No.310/Ran/2016 involves consequential penalty proceedings u/s 271E of the Act. The same is also accepted since

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D of\nthe Rules were applicable on the assessee and after giving a show\ncause computed the disallowance at Rs. 27,19,753/- comprising of\nRs. 9,11,753/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and Rs. 17,32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D of\nthe Rules were applicable on the assessee and after giving a show\ncause computed the disallowance at Rs. 27,19,753/- comprising of\nRs. 9,11,753/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and Rs. 17,32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 294/RAN/2017[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D of\nthe Rules were applicable on the assessee and after giving a show\ncause computed the disallowance at Rs. 27,19,753/- comprising of\nRs. 9,11,753/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and Rs. 17,32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

Section 14A of the Act r.w. Rule 8D of\nthe Rules were applicable on the assessee and after giving a show\ncause computed the disallowance at Rs. 27,19,753/- comprising of\nRs. 9,11,753/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and Rs. 17,32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules

ACIT, CENTRALC CIRCLE-1, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. IMPERIAL AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 171/RAN/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri R.R.Mittal, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 288A

68,630/- have been checked at random basis and some discrepancies wee found. Some of the bills/vouchers were found to be petty in nature and intentionally vouched. Considering this fact, 20% of expenses incurred under major head “other expenses” are disallowed and added back to the total income of assessee during the period under consideration,. Considering the above, expenses debited