BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna7Mumbai7Jaipur6Delhi6Pune3Bangalore2Ranchi2Indore2Chennai2SC1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Kolkata1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)20Section 153A10Section 132(1)6Section 271A2Section 2742Section 80G2Penalty2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2Undisclosed Income

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 16/RAN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

276C. 3.3.5. In fact, the facts and circumstances of the appellant case is squarely covered by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of MAK Data (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT reported in [2013] 358 ITR 593 (SC). In this decision the Hon'ble Apex court held as under: AY: 2010-11 & 2013-14 Sri Padam Kumar Jain

2

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 17/RAN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

276C. 3.3.5. In fact, the facts and circumstances of the appellant case is squarely covered by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of MAK Data (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT reported in [2013] 358 ITR 593 (SC). In this decision the Hon'ble Apex court held as under: AY: 2010-11 & 2013-14 Sri Padam Kumar Jain