BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 255(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi311Mumbai278Jaipur74Chennai64Chandigarh61Bangalore57Ahmedabad35Kolkata30Telangana27Pune25Hyderabad25Raipur21Allahabad20Guwahati17Cochin15Surat13Cuttack12Jodhpur10Patna10Indore9Amritsar9Visakhapatnam8Lucknow5Karnataka4Orissa4Rajkot3Ranchi3Nagpur2SC2Kerala2Agra1J&K1Rajasthan1Dehradun1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 153C8Section 1487Section 1477Section 143(3)4Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 153A2Section 153B2Section 148A

LAXMI HARD COKE MFG CO.,DHANBAD vs. ITO WARD 1(1), DHANBAD

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 101/RAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 153ASection 153BSection 153C

7, Rani Sati Market, Jharia, Ward 1(1), Vs. Dhanbad-828111 Dhanbad. PAN No. AAAFL 5944 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee represented by Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv. Department represented by Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr.DR Date of hearing 09/01/2025 Date of pronouncement 05/02/2025 O R D E R PER: PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. Both these appeals preferred

LUXMI HARD COKE MFG. CO,,DHANBAD vs. ITO WARD-1(1), DHANBAD

2
Search & Seizure2

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/RAN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 153ASection 153BSection 153C

7, Rani Sati Market, Jharia, Ward 1(1), Vs. Dhanbad-828111 Dhanbad. PAN No. AAAFL 5944 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee represented by Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv. Department represented by Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr.DR Date of hearing 09/01/2025 Date of pronouncement 05/02/2025 O R D E R PER: PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. Both these appeals preferred

KULDIP SINGH,RANCHI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/RAN/2025[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.180/Ran/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kuldip Singh…………………….……….……...................……….……Appellant The Avenue Vishnupuri Marg, Upper Burdwan Compound, Lalpur, Ranchi- 834001. [Pan: Agjps6921P] Vs. Dcit/Acit, Circle-1, Ranchi…...…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Kailash Gautam, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 05, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 10, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 06.03.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)

255 (Bombay)/[2020] 426 ITR 228 (Bombay)[11-03-2020] – Assessment year 2012-13 - For relevant year, assessee filed its return declaring certain taxable income - Assessment was completed under section 143(3) wherein certain additions were made to assessee's income - Subsequently, assessment was reopened in case of assessee - Reason recorded by Assessing Officer was that in case of search