BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234B(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai346Delhi314Bangalore128Ahmedabad84Jaipur50Hyderabad50Chennai36Pune31Kolkata24Agra22Chandigarh16Surat15Nagpur14Rajkot13Amritsar11Patna10Cochin10Indore10Lucknow8Visakhapatnam7Cuttack5Dehradun5Jodhpur4Allahabad4Ranchi3Raipur3Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 1489Section 10(38)4Section 143(2)4Long Term Capital Gains3Addition to Income3Section 234A2Section 144B2Penny Stock2

KONDA KARABI,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical for statistical purposes

ITA 4/RAN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaykonda Karabi, D.C.I.T., G/15, Nargis, Ashiana Garden Sonari, Circle-1, Vs. Jamshedpur-831011 Jamshedpur. Pan No. Abwpk 3757 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151A

reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO is arbitrary, unjustified, bad in law and fit to be quashed. 6. For that it was mandatory for the authorities concerned to initiate proceedings pertaining to re-assessment under Section 148A and issue of the notice u/s 148 of the Act in a faceless manner, rather than being proceeded by the local jurisdictional Assessing

Exemption2
Penalty2

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 202/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

234B on the assessed income. Interest should be charged on the returned income following the decision of Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court.” 3. Assessee has also prayed for admission of additional grounds under Rule 11 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 by placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC Limited

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

234B on the assessed income. Interest should be charged on the returned income following the decision of Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court.” 3. Assessee has also prayed for admission of additional grounds under Rule 11 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 by placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC Limited