BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19Delhi13Pune11Jaipur10Kolkata7Patna6Indore2SC2Ahmedabad2Ranchi2Hyderabad2Jodhpur1Bangalore1Chennai1Agra1Lucknow1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)20Section 153A10Section 132(1)6Section 271A2Section 2742Section 80G2Penalty2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 16/RAN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

u/s. 153A. Further, why only at the fag end of the assessment proceeding, the appellant by way of a letter admitted to the undisclosed income of Rs.54,00,000/-. Further the appellant has not offered any proper explanation in revising the return filed u/s.153A. All these events points to only one direction, that the appellant has deliberately tried his level

2
Undisclosed Income2

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 17/RAN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

u/s. 153A. Further, why only at the fag end of the assessment proceeding, the appellant by way of a letter admitted to the undisclosed income of Rs.54,00,000/-. Further the appellant has not offered any proper explanation in revising the return filed u/s.153A. All these events points to only one direction, that the appellant has deliberately tried his level