PADAM KUMAE JAIN,RANCHI vs. CIT, CENTRAL, PATNA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 289/RAN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Jul 2020AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.289/Ran/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Padam Kumar Jain Vs. Cit, Central, Cr Building, Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna – 800001. Ratanlalsurajmal Compound, Main Road, Ranchi – 834001, Jharkhand "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abrpj 0001 E (Assessee) .. (Revenue)
For Appellant: Shri M.K. Chaudhury & Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263
132A, S.P. Mukherjee Road, Kolkata – 700026 during the year. As per the related materials available on record, it is observed that the AO has allowed the expenses on account of loss and damage amounting to Rs. 4,00,00,000/- at the time of assessment without considering supporting evidences thereof, which indicates that the admissibility of the expenditure during
