ASHOK BEHL,RANCHI vs. ITO,WARD-1(1), RANCHI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 78/RAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Sept 2020AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Ashok Behl Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), Ranchi 1St Floor, Samridhi Complex, South Office Para, Doranda, Ranchi – 834001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Adwpb2438E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""थ" / Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri D. Sannigarh, ARFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Mohanti, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)
Short term Capital Asset. On further appeal to the Ld Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals), the ld CIT(A) denied to admit the claim of the assessee in regard to the capital gains as Long term with the contention that in absence of completion certificate issued by the Builder, the assessee cannot be considered as the owner of the property