SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 143(2) was issued against return under 148.” 4. On confrontation of these additional grounds for their admission, Ld. Sr. DR has not raised any objection. Accordingly, the same were admitted for adjudication. 5. Since additional grounds are on the jurisdictional issue, we are inclined to take up the same first. First three additional grounds relate to approval

ASHOK KUMAR MALHOTRA,DHANBAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), DHANBAD

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy)

19 to 23 of the paper book filed, whereas photographs of the land is given and submitted that the ld. CIT(A) records the fact that there are gardens of mango, guava etc. on the land. She once again drew the attention of the Bench to the facts recorded in the Revenue records, copies of which are placed

AMIT KUMAR SARAF ,KOLKATA vs. ITO WARD-3(1) , BOKARO

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S.Godarai.T.A No.296/Ran/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Amit Kumar Saraf Vs. Ito, Wd-3(1), Bokaro C/O R.K. Doshi & Associates, Eastern Building, 1St Floor, 19, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Kol-1. Pan/Gir No. : Asfps4134E (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

19, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Kol-1. PAN/GIR No. : ASFPS4134E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by None Respondent by Smt. Nisha Singhmarr, JCIT(DR) Date of hearing 03.03.2020 Date of pronouncement 03.03.2020 O R D E R S. S. Godara(Oral): This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hazaribag, Jharkhand dated 20.06.2017 passed

SUNITA ADUKIA,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-2, RANCHI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

4 | 17 ITA No.14 & 15/Ran/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 in the next financial year in place of cost incurred in the construction. Accordingly, the claim of deduction under section 54F was not allowed against the income from sale proceeds of the flat. Hence, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. Ld A.R. submitted that

ACIT CIRCLE-1, DHANBAD vs. SRI VIKASH AGARWAL, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

19. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the appellant is an individual and carrying on business of wholesale as well as retails trade in metal and metal ores in the name and style of proprietory concern namely M/s Jai Balajee Enterprises. During the assessment year under consideration, the assessee filed income tax return on 30/03/2019 declaring total

SRI AJAY KUMAR ,HAZARIBAGH vs. ITO WARD-1(1), HAZARIBAGH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA NO

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.243/Ran/2016 आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.207/Ran/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2009-10)

House Dipugarha, Hazaribagh-825301. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AELPK 5256 P (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri M. K. Choudhry, Advocate Respondent by :Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT (DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 06/03/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 08/07/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The captioned two appeals filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year

SHRI AJAY KUMARS/O SHRI KISAN BHAGWAT,HAZARIBAGH vs. ITO WARD-2(5), HAZARIBAGH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA NO

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.243/Ran/2016 आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.207/Ran/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2009-10)

House Dipugarha, Hazaribagh-825301. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AELPK 5256 P (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri M. K. Choudhry, Advocate Respondent by :Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT (DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 06/03/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 08/07/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The captioned two appeals filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year