Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,429 Delhi1,740 Bangalore837 Chennai813 Karnataka577 Kolkata386 Ahmedabad289 Jaipur273 Hyderabad220 Pune206 Surat177 Chandigarh136 Indore116 Cochin114 Raipur74 Lucknow68 Nagpur59 Calcutta58 Telangana56 SC52 Cuttack50 Visakhapatnam39 Rajkot37 Patna30 Amritsar27 Guwahati26 Agra16 Jodhpur14 Kerala12 Varanasi11 Allahabad8 Rajasthan7 Dehradun7 Ranchi4 Jabalpur4 Punjab & Haryana4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3 Panaji2 Andhra Pradesh2 Orissa1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Gauhati1 Himachal Pradesh1 J&K1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 1489 Section 1477 Section 143(2)5 Section 10(38)4 Penny Stock3 Exemption3 Addition to Income3 Section 234A2 Section 2502 Long Term Capital Gains

BIJOY KUMAR AGARWAL,RANCHI vs. ACIT/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 310/RAN/2025[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarmaandshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountantmember

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250

house property. The assessee also declared Long-Term Capital Gain of ₹30,55,833, claimed as exempt, arising from sale

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

2

ITA 202/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: Disposed

ITAT Ranchi

13 Dec 2023

AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

house property, capital gain and other sources. Original return was filed on 14.09.2011, reporting a total income of Rs.19,36,530/-. Subsequently, Ld. AO recorded the reasons to believe stating that assessee has claimed long term capital gain as exempt

SRI AJAY KUMAR MURARKA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/RAN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi13 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Ringasia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

house property, capital gain and other sources. Original return was filed on 14.09.2011, reporting a total income of Rs.19,36,530/-. Subsequently, Ld. AO recorded the reasons to believe stating that assessee has claimed long term capital gain as exempt

SUDHIR KUMAR JHA,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ACIT OR DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 131/RAN/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi24 Apr 2025AY 2017-2018

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Jha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. DR

exemption limit for filing income\nand total\nnet\nincome\n4.\ntax\nreturn. Copy of PAN enclosed as Annexure-2. Land ownership certicale for some larids\nin village Bardaha from anchal karyalaya is attached as Annexure -3.\n5.\nMostly I am doing sale of agricultural proceeds paddy and wheat in cash to have better price\nand ease of sale However