BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 215clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai887Delhi709Chennai292Bangalore202Ahmedabad192Jaipur124Kolkata120Agra84Hyderabad80Chandigarh72Surat72Pune58Indore48Rajkot36Visakhapatnam35Raipur34Cochin22Amritsar20Lucknow18Cuttack17Karnataka15Jabalpur12Panaji11Jodhpur9SC8Guwahati6Dehradun5Telangana4Allahabad3Ranchi2Nagpur2Varanasi2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Patna1Orissa1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 114Addition to Income2

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

ITA 230/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Nov 2018

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohanty, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 215Section 271(1)(c)

215, as such, exemption u/s 11 to 13 was denied. 3. For that the appellant was doing trading to support the unfortunate widows and other handicapped persons to earn their livelihood and to support themselves. Surplus generated was used for the purposes of charity. As such, Ld. CIT(A) was P a g e 3 | 14 ITA No. 230/R

M/S JOKHIRAM DURGADUTT,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RNC

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 47/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.47/Ran/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) M/S Jokhiram Durgadutt, Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Ranchi Sarawgi House, J.J.Road, Upper Bazar, Ranchi-834001 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabfj 2200 Q (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. निर्धाऩिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.S.Paul, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mondal, Addl.Cit(Dr)

For Appellant: Shri P.S.Paul, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, Addl.CIT(DR)

215 Rs.71,99,927/- before any relief by I.T.A.T Ground No: 6 That the other and further ground will be argued at the time of hearing. 4 2. Brief facts of the case are that the the assessee is engaged in the business of real estate dealer, let out of properties, revenue sharing of cinema hall & gaming zone & mall maintenance