BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 199clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai913Delhi872Bangalore274Kolkata234Ahmedabad220Chennai217Jaipur147Hyderabad114Pune95Chandigarh78Rajkot59Raipur57Lucknow49Indore49Cuttack47Calcutta38Jodhpur29Visakhapatnam27Allahabad24Nagpur23Surat22Karnataka21Cochin19Guwahati12Amritsar8Agra7Telangana7Ranchi4SC4Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana3Varanasi1Jabalpur1Orissa1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 685Section 143(3)4Section 41(1)4Section 133(6)4Addition to Income4Disallowance3Section 44A2

SHRI NAVNEET MODI,RANCHI vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 106/RAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Oct 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.106/Ran/2019 & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.53/Ran/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2015-2016 & 2013-2014) Shri Navneet Modi, Vs. Dcit, Circle-2, Ranchi Modi House, Kanke Dam Side Road, Kanke, Ranchi स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan No. : Actpm 1511 F (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Inderjeet Singh, Cit(Dr)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

199 ITR 14 (SC), the Hon'ble Court held that ITA No.2620/Kol/2013 A.Y. 2010-11 ITO Wd-12(1), Kol. vs. M/s Standard Leather Pvt. Ltd. Page 15 cessation of liability for the purpose of section 41(1) means irrevocable cessation so that there is no possibility of the liability being revived in future. If there is such a possibility

RAMESH KESHRI,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD W2(3), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 36/RAN/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi04 Feb 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryramesh Keshri, I.T.O., Near Suzuki Showroom, Piska More, Ward 2(3), Vs. Ranchi-834005 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aftpk 1039 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 44A

disallowance of trade discount. At para four (4) of the assessment order, it is noted as follows: "4.0 A letter under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to M/s Neutral Publishing House Limited on 20/09/2018. The contents of the letter are reproduced as under: "The case of Shri Ramesh Keshri, PAN: AFTPK

ACIT, CIRCLE-3, RANCHI vs. SHRI SUMIT RAMSISARIA, RANCHI

ITA 222/RAN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi11 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

disallowed and added to the total income of the assessee. In the instant case, the balances of many of the sundry creditors were outstanding coming from earlier years. Payments were made to some or the creditors during the year. The said payments have been accepted by the AO which means genuinity of the payments to these creditors as well

JAMIPOL LTD,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of assessee being ITA Nos

ITA 68/RAN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi01 Mar 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Ranjan Mittal, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Sanjay Prasad, CIT(A), ld.Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37(2)

disallowance can be made on adhoc basis, which is not at all maintainable in the eye of law. Therefore, ground no.1 relating to addition of Rs. 49,42,950/- on account of Other expenses, Traveling expenses, Advertisement, Promotion & Selling of expenses made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT-A is deleted. 34. Ground no. 2 relating to confirmation