BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 153(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,816Delhi1,710Chennai566Bangalore482Jaipur271Ahmedabad212Kolkata208Hyderabad205Chandigarh152Surat148Indore123Cochin118Pune100Amritsar96Raipur88Lucknow48Karnataka45Guwahati43Allahabad43Nagpur41Rajkot38Cuttack33Jodhpur25Dehradun20Visakhapatnam17Patna17SC12Telangana10Calcutta10Agra5Panaji4Ranchi2Gauhati2Jabalpur2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 80P7Section 143(3)5Section 2633Section 542Deduction2

SUNITA ADUKIA,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-2, RANCHI

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

ITA 15/RAN/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Oct 2019

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Ranjan Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 54

section 153 A(l) of income tax act. The assessment order passed by Assessing Officer for A/Y 2013-14 and for which appeal was pending has abated on the date search is initiated i.e 19.01.2017. Order passed by Honourable CIT (appeal) dated 16.10.2017 is a void order. The order is passed on assessment which has abated. Assessee brought this fact

CHOTANAGPUR CATHOLIC MISSION CO – OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY ,RANCHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI, RANCHI

ITA 41/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.S.Paul, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80P

Section 80P of the Act. It was the prayer that the order of the ld. Pr.CIT is liable to be quashed. 3. In reply, ld. CIT-DR submitted that in view of the decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Cooperative Sales Society, reported 322 ITR 283 (SC) and in the case of Secunderabad Club