BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi221Chennai156Mumbai118Bangalore99Jaipur91Hyderabad80Kolkata69Ahmedabad50Visakhapatnam41Surat40Lucknow35Pune35Chandigarh32Panaji32Rajkot31Agra23Jodhpur18Cuttack18Indore13Patna12Raipur10Amritsar10Dehradun10Allahabad6Nagpur5Jabalpur4Cochin4Varanasi3Karnataka2Ranchi2Calcutta2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P7Section 143(3)3Section 2633Cash Deposit2Demonetization2Disallowance2

CHOTANAGPUR CATHOLIC MISSION CO – OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY ,RANCHI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI, RANCHI

ITA 41/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.S.Paul, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80P

demonetization period and has made a disallowance on that issue. The fact that the members of the society have not taken

VISHNU KUMAR BHARTIA,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD-3(2), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 43/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ranchi
19 Aug 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayvishnu Kumar Bhartia, I.T.O., Prop.-M/S Madhur Mani, Morth Market Ward 3(2), Vs. Road, Upper Bazar, Ranchi-834001. Ranchi. Pan No. Adgpb 9180 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

disallowance from the sundry debtors. It was a submission that the all the sundry debtors, ledgers has been produced, they are income tax assessee, their PAN numbers were available in the ledger and confirmation of accounts. It was a further submissions that the Assessing Officer has not identified which of the debtors recovered is not being accepted