BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 254(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai987Delhi664Chennai237Bangalore209Kolkata133Ahmedabad67Jaipur56Hyderabad50Raipur36Surat29Karnataka28Chandigarh27Lucknow26Pune25Indore20SC13Cochin11Nagpur8Rajkot7Telangana7Guwahati6Panaji5Calcutta5Amritsar4Kerala2Jabalpur2Ranchi2Varanasi1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Cuttack1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2Addition to Income2

M/S. HIMACHAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO, WARD NO.1(5), JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 45/RAN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250

254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in I.T.A. No.: 45/RAN/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/s. Himanchal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 20.02.2020 which is arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 143(3)/154/263 of the Act dated 30.03.2015. 2. The assessee

SHRI KIRTIMAN SINGH,RANCHI vs. DCIT, RANCHI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 122/RAN/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ranchi
30 May 2025
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) Shri Kirtiman Singh, D.C.I.T., 357/A, Professor Colony, Karam Toli, Circle-2, Vs. Behind Abhilasha Building, Morabadi, Ranchi. Ranchi-834001. Pan No. Awmps 5592 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 131Section 133ASection 145(3)

1. For that ld. AO made an estimate of profit at 10% which was reduced to 8% by ld. CIT(A). The turnover of Rs.2,00,97,709/- was accepted. The appellant has maintained audited books of accounts which was verifiable in past, the book result disclosed was accepted. Ld. AO was, therefore, not justified in making an estimate