M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Central Coalfields Ltd., D.C.I.T., Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, Circle-1, Vs. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue D.C.I.T., Central Coalfield Ltd., Circle-1, 4Th Floor, Central Revenue Building Vs. Ranchi. Annexee, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) was passed by the Assessing Officer and following additions/disallowances were made: M/s CCL Vs DCIT & 1 Anr. Sl. No. Head of addition/disallowance Amount (i) Income from tax free bonds & applicability ₹ 33,45,000/- of Sec. 14A of the I.T. Act. (ii) Depreciation on Lease Hold Land

DCIT,CIRCLE-1,RANCHI, RANCHI vs. CENTRAL COALFIELD LTD, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Central Coalfields Ltd., D.C.I.T., Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, Circle-1, Vs. Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue D.C.I.T., Central Coalfield Ltd., Circle-1, 4Th Floor, Central Revenue Building Vs. Ranchi. Annexee, 5A, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaacc 7476 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) was passed by the Assessing Officer and following additions/disallowances were made: M/s CCL Vs DCIT & 1 Anr. Sl. No. Head of addition/disallowance Amount (i) Income from tax free bonds & applicability ₹ 33,45,000/- of Sec. 14A of the I.T. Act. (ii) Depreciation on Lease Hold Land

JOKHIRAM DURGADUTT,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayjokhiram Durgadutt, D.C.I.T., 9, J.D. Corporate, Behind J.D. High Circle-1, Vs. Street, Main Road, Ranchi-834001 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aabfj 2200 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

section 271 (1)(c)." 4. The contention of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeal ) that the assessee had claimed an unallowable standard deduction of Rs. 68,36,208/- is fully compensated by way of depreciation being allowed Rs. 2,31,19,350/-. So, the revenue is no way being put at loss or in other wards the assessee

M/S. HIMACHAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO, WARD NO.1(5), JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sonjoy Sarma

depreciation. In other words the net addition sustained is Rs.26,34,060/-(Rs.41,43,171 - 15,09,111) as against addition made of Rs.55,24,228/- and the appellant gets a part relief of Rs. 28,90,168/-. Accordingly, this ground is partly allowed.” 6. Now, before us, ld. Counsel for the assessee has referred to the decision of this

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

section 37(1) of Income-tax\nAct. 1961 which lays down that \"any expenditure laid out or expended\n113/15 Wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business\" shall be allowed in\nANDRANATH GOOL, computing the income. It may not be out of place to note here that every year M/s\nBCCL, incurs expenses of over Rs. 700 crs under

JHARKHAND ROAD PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION COMPANY LIMITED,RANCHI vs. DCIT,C.C.-1, RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The appellant submitted that it had constructed the road as a part of the concessionaire agreement entered into between the government of Jharkhand and Jharkhand Accelerated Road Development company Limited and the assessee company and the project was awarded to the appellant on BOT and annuity basis. The appellant also placed reliance

JHARKHAND ROAD PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION CO. LTD,RANCHI vs. DCIT CENT. CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The appellant submitted that it had constructed the road as a part of the concessionaire agreement entered into between the government of Jharkhand and Jharkhand Accelerated Road Development company Limited and the assessee company and the project was awarded to the appellant on BOT and annuity basis. The appellant also placed reliance

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344 82,28,00,000 58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3. The first issue is with regard to disallowance of Lease\nRent/Depreciation Forest Land expenses. It was submitted that the\nassessee in some years has paid and some years been treated as the\namortisation over

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344\n82,28,00,000\n58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3. The first issue is with regard to disallowance of Lease\nRent/Depreciation Forest Land expenses. It was submitted that the\nassessee in some years has paid and some years been treated as the\namortisation over

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

1 Disallowance of depreciation 33,77,40,312/- 2 Stock difference 49,47,59,000/- 3 Disallowance out of repairs & maintenance 7,41,75,000/- 4 Repair of building and plant & machinery for pay 2,62,24,766/- office 5 Repairs and maintenance 2,06,44,292/- 6 Store purchase 6,78,69,000/- 7 Explosive purchases

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LIMITED ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

1 Disallowance of depreciation 33,77,40,312/- 2 Stock difference 49,47,59,000/- 3 Disallowance out of repairs & maintenance 7,41,75,000/- 4 Repair of building and plant & machinery for pay 2,62,24,766/- office 5 Repairs and maintenance 2,06,44,292/- 6 Store purchase 6,78,69,000/- 7 Explosive purchases

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

section 37(1) of Income-tax\nAct. 1961 which lays down that \"any expenditure ... laid out or expended\nwholly and exclusively for the purposes of business\" shall be allowed in\ncomputing the income. It may not be out of place to note here that every year M/s\nANDRANATH GOOL, incurs expenses of over Rs. 700 crs under the head \"contractual

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

section 132(1)\nof the Act was carried out in the case of Sri Lal Babu Singh on November 23,\n2011. In the course of search operations, cash in the form of deposits in the bank\naccounts of Rs. 75.78 crs and Fixed Deposits of Rs. 17.40 crs were found and\nseized.\nBCCL,\nPost-search investigations in this group

ITO WARD-2(1), JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S OM DAYAL INGOTS&STEEL CO. PVT LTD , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, application u/s 27 filed by the assessee is allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

1) and sub-section (2), the Principal Chief Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner or the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner or the Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, being satisfied on the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer about fitness of a case for the issue of notice under Section 148, need not issue such notice himself.” 8. Having

ITO WD -2(1), JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S OM DAYAL INGOTS &STEEL CO. PVT LTD , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, application u/s 27 filed by the assessee is allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

1) and sub-section (2), the Principal Chief Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner or the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner or the Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, being satisfied on the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer about fitness of a case for the issue of notice under Section 148, need not issue such notice himself.” 8. Having

M/S. CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. ACIT/DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure\nAllowability of (Welfare expenses of employees)\nAssessee-\ncompany was engaged in business of coal mining It claimed\nexpenses incurred towards welfare of of its employees like canteen,\nhostels, etc. business expenditure Commissioner disallowed same\non ground that said expenditures had not been properly explained\nand that assessee

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

depreciation has already been\nadjudicated in the assessee's own case by the coordinate bench of the\nTribunal, respectfully following the observations of the coordinate bench of\nthe Tribunal and for the identical reasons, the order of the Id. CIT(A) stands\nupheld and the issue is held in favour of the assessee and against the\nrevenue.\n5.\nNext issue

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

depreciation again. However, this year is prior to the amendment made in section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. CIT(Appeals