BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Pune212Ahmedabad209Chennai207Jaipur146Kolkata107Delhi99Bangalore69Hyderabad62Surat39Chandigarh26Lucknow26Nagpur22Rajkot20Amritsar16Indore15Visakhapatnam8Jodhpur7Agra7Jabalpur6Panaji5Raipur4Cuttack4Allahabad3Cochin3Ranchi3Calcutta3SC2Guwahati2Varanasi1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80G10Section 12A8Exemption3Charitable Trust2

SHISHU NIKETAN TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, this appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 69/RAN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshishu Niketan Trust, C.I.T.(Exemption), Road No. 19, Farm Area, Kadma, Patna. Vs. Jamshedpur-831005 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aacts 5425 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 80G

Section 80G of the Act. It was a prayer that the issues may be restored to the file of ld. CIT(E) so as to enable the assessee to comply with the notices within time. Shishu Niketan Trust Vs CIT(E) 4. In reply, the ld. CIT-Departmental Representative did not raise any serious objection. 5. We have considered

THE STRAY ARMY CHARITABLE TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(E), EXEMPTION WARD JAMSHEDPUR / CIT(E) PATNA, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 54/RAN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi
22 Apr 2025
AY 2024-25
For Appellant: Shri Manish Kr. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 12ASection 80G

condoned the delay in filing the appeals, acknowledging the reasonable cause shown by the assessee. It was observed that the assessee failed to represent itself before the Ld. CIT(E) due to ignorance.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "12A", "80G

THE STRAY ARMY CHARITABLE TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(E), EXEMPTION WARD JAMSHEDPUR / CIT(E) PATNA, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 53/RAN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi22 Apr 2025AY 2024-25
For Appellant: Shri Manish Kr. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 12ASection 80G

condoned the delay in filing the appeals due to reasonable cause. It was observed that the assessee failed to represent itself before the Ld. CIT(E) due to ignorance. Therefore, the issues were restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for re-adjudication.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "12A", "80G