M/S EKLAVYA ESTATE PVT.LTD.,RANCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI, RANCHI
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 258/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi03 Feb 2026AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaym/S Eklavya Estate Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., H-95, Harmu Housing Colony, Central Circle-2, Vs. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Pan No. Aabce 5815 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue
Section 133ASection 270ASection 274
1. For that the Ld CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the penalty of Rs.
2,83,995/-imposed by the Ld AO invoking section 270A of the Act.
2. For that the initiation of penalty proceedings was itself ab-initio void since the AO has specifically failed to mention the charges for which the proceedings have been initiated