BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 263(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai422Kolkata327Delhi263Mumbai263Pune256Bangalore161Hyderabad151Karnataka114Jaipur98Ahmedabad88Chandigarh78Visakhapatnam73Indore62Cochin58Calcutta56Cuttack55Panaji41Rajkot36Surat36Raipur35Nagpur27Amritsar25Patna20Lucknow17Dehradun9Varanasi7SC7Jabalpur7Jodhpur6Agra6Guwahati5Telangana4Ranchi3Allahabad2Punjab & Haryana2Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26313Section 409Section 194C3Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3

K M MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & RESERCH CENTRE (P) LTD,BOKARO vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, HAZARIBAG

In the result, this ground of appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 19/RAN/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40

1. For that the learned officers below have erred in making addition of the amount of ₹ 3,00,000/- especially in view of the fact that there was no agreement to make any payment under Section 194C and therefore provision of Section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable in this case. Even if the appellant was liable to deduct

SHRI SACHIDANAND PRASAD,WEST SINGHBHUM vs. SRI MAHABIR PRASAD RUNGTA, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 131/RAN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi25 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalea.Y. : 2012-2013 Sri Sachidanand Prasad, Vs The Principal Cit, 161, Thana No.745, Central, Patna Balijhoran, Nowamundi, West Singhbum-711102 Pan No. : Abwpp 8560 D Respondent (Appellant) .

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Poddar & Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sutariya, CIT(A), JSR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40

Delay condoned. In all these cases, we find that the Commissioner of Income Tax had passed an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with the observations that the Assessing Officer did not make any proper inquiry while making the assessment and accepting the explanation of the assessee(s) insofar as receipt of share application money

SHRI VIJAY PRASAD,WEST SINGHBHUM vs. PR. CIT, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 130/RAN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi25 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalea.Y. : 2012-2013 Sri Vijay Prasad, Vs The Principal Cit, 161, Thana No.745, Central, Patna Balijhoran, Nowamundi, West Singhbum-711102 Pan No. : Ailpp 0228 L Respondent (Appellant) .

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Poddar & Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sutariya, CIT(A), JSR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40

Delay condoned. In all these cases, we find that the Commissioner of Income Tax had passed an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with the observations that the Assessing Officer did not make any proper inquiry while making the assessment and accepting the explanation of the assessee(s) insofar as receipt of share application money