BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(47)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai565Mumbai483Delhi418Kolkata271Bangalore194Ahmedabad167Karnataka151Chandigarh138Jaipur133Hyderabad126Pune124Raipur91Nagpur74Indore63Lucknow48Calcutta44Visakhapatnam42Surat35Cuttack31Rajkot28SC25Patna24Cochin18Guwahati13Telangana12Agra9Amritsar8Allahabad8Varanasi6Jodhpur5Rajasthan4Orissa3Ranchi3Panaji3Dehradun1Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Jabalpur1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 44A4Section 1483Section 69A2Addition to Income2

SUMBUL ALAM,RANCHI vs. ASSISTANT COOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 412/RAN/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2026AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 148Section 44ASection 69A

2. We found from perusal of the record that there is a delay of 266 days in filing this appeal before this Tribunal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed by the assessee mentioning the fact that for the income tax compliances, the appellant's had appointed her Authorised Representative but her Authorised Representative has failed

SUMBUL ALAM,RANCHI vs. THE ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 411/RAN/2025[2019-2020]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ranchi
05 Feb 2026
AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 148Section 44ASection 69A

2. We found from perusal of the record that there is a delay of 266 days in filing this appeal before this Tribunal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed by the assessee mentioning the fact that for the income tax compliances, the appellant's had appointed her Authorised Representative but her Authorised Representative has failed

DEBASREE SENGUPTA,SONARI vs. ITO WARD 1 (1), JAMSHEDPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 34/RAN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 144Section 148

47, C.H. Area, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand Appearances by: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Sumit Dasgupta, Sr. D.R., appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing: December 10, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: December 17, 2025 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:- The present appeal is directed