BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(22)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,149Mumbai933Delhi829Kolkata569Bangalore430Pune363Hyderabad338Ahmedabad320Jaipur280Patna186Karnataka169Visakhapatnam158Nagpur154Chandigarh134Surat130Indore114Cochin94Lucknow92Cuttack88Raipur81Amritsar69Panaji46Calcutta40SC38Rajkot36Jodhpur33Guwahati26Agra25Telangana17Allahabad17Jabalpur12Varanasi12Dehradun9Ranchi5Orissa4Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Kerala1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 234E26Section 200A20Condonation of Delay5Section 1544TDS4Rectification u/s 1544Section 80G2Limitation/Time-bar2

SHISHU NIKETAN TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PATNA, PATNA

In the result, this appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 69/RAN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshishu Niketan Trust, C.I.T.(Exemption), Road No. 19, Farm Area, Kadma, Patna. Vs. Jamshedpur-831005 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aacts 5425 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 80G

2. Shri Shubham Choudhary, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Rajib Jain, ld. CIT-DR represented on behalf of the revenue. 3. It was submitted by the ld. AR that there was a delay in submitting the compliance to the notice issued by the ld. CIT(E). It was a submission that consequently

HARDEEP SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(TDS)J, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 353/RAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Pawan Periwal, CA(AR)For Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

E R These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur, both dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, I find that as per the office note, there is a delay of 91 days in filing both the appeals under considerations

HARDEEP SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(TDS)J, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 354/RAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Pawan Periwal, CA(AR)For Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

E R These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur, both dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, I find that as per the office note, there is a delay of 91 days in filing both the appeals under considerations

M/S VIKAS SAMITIES,JAMSHEDPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, RANCHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 355/RAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Oct 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Pawan Periwal, CA(AR)For Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

E R Per Bench : These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur, both dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment years 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, we find that both appeals of the assessee are barred by limitation. Ld. AR has filed a petition in both

M/S VIKAS SAMITIES,JAMSHEDPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, RANCHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 356/RAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Oct 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Pawan Periwal, CA(AR)For Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

E R Per Bench : These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur, both dated 30.07.2018 for the assessment years 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, we find that both appeals of the assessee are barred by limitation. Ld. AR has filed a petition in both