BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 139(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai715Mumbai437Delhi430Kolkata367Bangalore329Hyderabad221Pune212Ahmedabad208Jaipur185Chandigarh125Indore92Surat84Cochin82Lucknow52Visakhapatnam51Raipur38Rajkot32Amritsar27Nagpur27Patna26Cuttack26Guwahati23Jodhpur17Agra16Panaji15Jabalpur12Allahabad11SC10Dehradun9Varanasi3Ranchi2

Key Topics

Section 801B8Section 143(1)(a)4Section 139(1)4Section 139(4)2Section 1392Section 8012Deduction2Condonation of Delay2

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

4. We have considered the submissions of both the parties on the plea of condonation of delay, we find that the impugned order was passed on 28/07/2023, however, the present appeals are filed on 09/01/2024, the registry has calculated delay of 173 days each in filing both the appeals. As recorded above, the assessee submitted that due to medical treatment

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/RAN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

4. We have considered the submissions of both the parties on the plea of condonation of delay, we find that the impugned order was passed on 28/07/2023, however, the present appeals are filed on 09/01/2024, the registry has calculated delay of 173 days each in filing both the appeals. As recorded above, the assessee submitted that due to medical treatment