ALOK KUMAR,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO
In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 185/RAN/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2005-06
Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
2. The Supreme Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy 2008(228)
ELT 162. While condoning the delay of 883 days intiling an application for setting aside the ex parte decree held "That the purpose of Limitation Act was not to destroy the rights. It is founded on public policy fixing a life span tor the legal remedy
