ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 154 was served upon him at the old address. That communication had also consumed time. Therefore, the assessee could not gain anything by filing the appeal late. There was no mala fide imputable to the assessee. The delay in filing the thrice in a short span. In every case of delay there can be some lapse of the litigant

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 154 was served upon him at the old address. That communication had also consumed time. Therefore, the assessee could not gain anything by filing the appeal late. There was no mala fide imputable to the assessee. The delay in filing the thrice in a short span. In every case of delay there can be some lapse of the litigant

ALOK KUMAR,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 154 was served upon him at the old address. That communication had also consumed time. Therefore, the assessee could not gain anything by filing the appeal late. There was no mala fide imputable to the assessee. The delay in filing the thrice in a short span. In every case of delay there can be some lapse of the litigant

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 154 was served upon him at the old address. That communication had also consumed time. Therefore, the assessee could not gain anything by filing the appeal late. There was no mala fide imputable to the assessee. The delay in filing the thrice in a short span. In every case of delay there can be some lapse of the litigant

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 154 was served upon him at the old address. That communication had also consumed time. Therefore, the assessee could not gain anything by filing the appeal late. There was no mala fide imputable to the assessee. The delay in filing the thrice in a short span. In every case of delay there can be some lapse of the litigant

JAMSHEDPUR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, grounds of appeals raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Jamshedpur Management Association, C.I.T.(Exemption), 18, Centre For Excellence, Ch Area Patna Vs. (East), Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaeaj 2108 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

condoned. Now adverting to the merit of the case. 5. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the appellant is a society and filed an application in Form 10AB before the ld. CIT(E), Patna on 20/10/2022 for grant of regular registration under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of Section 12A read with section

ALHAMD EDUCATION & WELFARE TRUST,HAZARIBAGH vs. ITO - WARD 1(1), AAYKAR BHAWAN, HAZARIBAGH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

condoning delay.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": ["Section 250", "Section 143(1)", "Income-tax Act, 1961"], "issues": "Whether the appeal was rightly

CHANDRAVANSHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,GARHWA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Chandravanshi Educational Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption), C/O-R C Chandravanshi Welfare Trust, Patna. Vs. Garhwa-833114 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aagcc 7713 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

condone the delay in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, as mentioned in the order of ld. CIT(E) are that an application in Form 10AB was filed on 30/03/2024 by the appellant i.e. Chandravanshi Educational Foundation for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

delay of about four months in filing this appeal before this Tribunal is condoned. 4. Now coming to the merit of the case, the brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust and filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2016-17 on 21/10/2016 in Form ITR-7 and claimed exemption under Section

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

GAJANAN FERRO PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

RINKU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

NITU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

section 271(1)(c). 5. That the assessee craves lave to add, alter or amend any ground before or at the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served on the given address. 3. Submissions of the ld. Sr.DR for the revenue were

DINESH AGARWAL HUF,PATNA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

1. For that Ld CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee ex-parte without appreciating the facts and grounds of appeal. 2. For that there is a double addition of Rs. 17,66,329/- to the extent that the same has been added by the Ld AO individually as well as included

DINESH AGARWAL HUF,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

1. For that Ld CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee ex-parte without appreciating the facts and grounds of appeal. 2. For that there is a double addition of Rs. 17,66,329/- to the extent that the same has been added by the Ld AO individually as well as included

KUMAR PRATIK,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAHIBGANJ

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Kumar Pratik, I.T.O., Tower C2, Flat 1402, Eden City, Sahibganj. Vs. Mahestala, Kolkata-700137. Pan No. Buapp 7990 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

1 Disallowance under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. (Addition Rs. 3,08,005/- towards stamp duty and registration charges of Flat. This amount was received from sister, Kumari Sonali for payment of stamp duty and registration. She is my sister and received the amount as gift which is not taxable as received from relative. Kumari Sonali, Doner

BABY CHATTERJEE,RANCHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Baby Chatterjee, I.T.O., 2A/2B, Krishna Enclave, North Office Ward 1(3), Vs. Para, Doranda, Ranchi-834002 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Anppc 8818 A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

delay of about one month in filing this appeal is condoned. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee had declared income under the head 'income from salary and income from other sources (interest)' for the assessment year under consideration and declared total income at ₹ 4,16,400/- . The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS