Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

96 results for “condonation of delay”

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162 Mumbai5,355 Delhi4,820 Kolkata3,420 Pune2,601 Bangalore2,305 Ahmedabad1,653 Hyderabad1,619 Jaipur1,071 Patna1,049 Cochin772 Chandigarh764 Nagpur704 Cuttack700 Surat681 Indore622 Visakhapatnam504 Amritsar478 Lucknow462 Raipur451 Karnataka391 Rajkot388 Agra340 Calcutta258 Panaji253 Dehradun156 Guwahati143 Jodhpur119 Jabalpur102 Ranchi96 SC79 Telangana77 Allahabad68 Varanasi44 Kerala32 Andhra Pradesh21 Orissa14 Punjab & Haryana12 Rajasthan11 Himachal Pradesh6 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 Uttarakhand1 DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1 VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)58 Section 27438 Condonation of Delay37 Addition to Income27 Limitation/Time-bar26 Penalty25 Section 12A23 Section 153A16 Exemption

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 199/RAN/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condoning the delay, therefore, we condone the delay in filing of all these appeals before this Tribunal. 8. We have

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/RAN/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condoning the delay, therefore, we condone the delay in filing of all these appeals before this Tribunal. 8. We have

Showing 1–20 of 96 · Page 1 of 5

14

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 200/RAN/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condoning the delay, therefore, we condone the delay in filing of all these appeals before this Tribunal. 8. We have

ALOK KUMAR,KANKE ROAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 201/RAN/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condoning the delay, therefore, we condone the delay in filing of all these appeals before this Tribunal. 8. We have

ALOK KUMAR,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE TWO

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 185/RAN/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Oct 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condoning the delay, therefore, we condone the delay in filing of all these appeals before this Tribunal. 8. We have

PRAVIN KUMAR,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C.C.1, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 327/RAN/2025[21-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.327/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2021-2022) Pravin Kumar, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, S/O-D. Thakur, Beed Banglow Ranchi Tatisilwai, Ranchi-835103 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Bhupk 7127 E (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: ShriFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr. DR

delayed by 237 days for which the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay and prayed that delay

DINESH AGARWAL HUF,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 263/RAN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 143(3)Section 40

delay of 65 days in filing this appeal before this Tribunal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed

DINESH AGARWAL HUF,PATNA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 262/RAN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 143(3)Section 40

delay of 65 days in filing this appeal before this Tribunal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed

MOHAMMAD ASIF RAZA,JUGSALAI vs. ITO, C.H.AREA

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 151/RAN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Mohammad Asif Raza, I.T.O., Hussini Line Near Smart Tailer, Purani Ward 1(1), Vs. Basti Road, Jugsalai, Jamshedpur. Jamshedpur-831006 Pan No. Bqwpr 9615 M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

condonation of delay mentioning the fact that the delay in filing of appeal occurs due to dispute P a g e 1 | 5 Mohammad

MOUNT OLIVE'S WELFARE TRUST,GUMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS) WARD- RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 252/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: the Tribunal was due to the fact that after corona virus

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Goenka, ld ARFor Respondent: Shri Khub Chand Pandya, Sr hri Khub Chand Pandya, Sr DR

delay in filing the appeal be condoned. 4. After considering the delay condonation petition and hearing ld AR, we are satisfied

AWADH KISHORE,RANCHI vs. ITO WARD-1(1),, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 219/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: the Id CIT(A) was delayed by five and half months. He prayed that the delay be condoned and matter be restored to the file of the Id CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. 4. Upon consideration the submission of Id AR of the assessee, we are satisfied that the assessee had given reasonable cause for condoning the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Id CIT(A). We also notice that the assessee has not been able to produce the evidences before the AO, for which, as

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar/Mras Lavanya G Mittal/ARsFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr

condoning the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before the ld CIT(A). We also notice

KIRTIMAN SINGH,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C. C.- 2, RANCHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 292/RAN/2025[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.292, 293 & 294/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Kirtiman Singh, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-2, 357/A, Professor Colony, Ranchi Karam Toli, Ranchi-834008 Jharkhand स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Awmps 5592 F (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr

condonation of delay which are not found to be false. Ld. Sr. DR has no objection to condone the delay

KIRTIMAN SINGH,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C. C.-2, RANCHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/RAN/2025[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.292, 293 & 294/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Kirtiman Singh, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-2, 357/A, Professor Colony, Ranchi Karam Toli, Ranchi-834008 Jharkhand स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Awmps 5592 F (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr

condonation of delay which are not found to be false. Ld. Sr. DR has no objection to condone the delay

KIRTIMAN SINGH,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C. C.-2, RANCHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 294/RAN/2025[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.292, 293 & 294/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Kirtiman Singh, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-2, 357/A, Professor Colony, Ranchi Karam Toli, Ranchi-834008 Jharkhand स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Awmps 5592 F (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr

condonation of delay which are not found to be false. Ld. Sr. DR has no objection to condone the delay

CHANDRAVANSHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,GARHWA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 473/RAN/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Chandravanshi Educational Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption), C/O-R C Chandravanshi Welfare Trust, Patna. Vs. Garhwa-833114 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aagcc 7713 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

condonation petition and the meagerness of the delay, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Facts

M/S. JUNIOR CHAMBER INTERNATIONAL,,RANCHI vs. ITO , EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the appellant are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 33/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

condonation of delay. In the condonation application, the learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the appellant stated that the delay

ASHOK KUMAR SINGHAL,ADITYAPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 313/RAN/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri George Mathan(Through Hybrid Mode) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.313/Ran/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2018-2019) Ashok Kumar Singhal, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Circle-1, Singhbhum Steel Enterprises, Jamshedpur Main Road, Jamshedpur स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aryps 3279 A (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kumar Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Khubchand T Pandya, Sr. DR

condone the 2 delay. Accordingly, I condone the delay of 133 days in the appeal and the appeal of the assessee

HRIDAAN ENTERPRISE,DUMKA vs. ITO, DUMKA

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 262/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Hridaan Enterprises, I.T.O., Bhagalpur Road, Dumka. Dumka. Vs. Pan No. Aajfh 3035 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 68

delay of 28 days in filing of this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed by the ld. CIT(A) on 07/03/2024, however, this appeal was filed on 03/06/2024. The assessee has filed application for condonation

JAMSHEDPUR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, grounds of appeals raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 157/RAN/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Jamshedpur Management Association, C.I.T.(Exemption), 18, Centre For Excellence, Ch Area Patna Vs. (East), Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaeaj 2108 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

delay of 17 days in filing this appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed by the ld. CIT(E) on 24/04/2023, however, this appeal is filed on 10/07/2023. The assessee has filed application for condonation

NIRMALA TULSYAN,DHANBAD vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3, RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 197/RAN/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Feb 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

delay of 15 days each in filing of both these appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal. Impugned order was passed by the ld. CIT(A) on 23/06/2023, however, these appeals are filed on 09/09/2023. The assessee has filed application for condonation