BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai387Ahmedabad325Pune295Delhi223Chennai208Jaipur199Kolkata142Surat126Bangalore116Hyderabad69Chandigarh46Rajkot44Indore43Amritsar41Nagpur37Visakhapatnam34Lucknow34Cochin21Cuttack21Jodhpur14Agra14Raipur11Jabalpur10Ranchi10Panaji9Allahabad6Patna6Dehradun2Guwahati1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A40Section 1118Section 80G18Section 1014Section 2(15)12Exemption10Section 194J4Section 802Charitable Trust2TDS

AL ALMAAS HAIDER CHARITABLE TRUST ,SHOP NO FIRST, FIRST FLOOR GEL CHURCH COMPLEX vs. EXEMPTION WARD RANCHI, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, RANCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/RAN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 12ASection 80G

Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the A.Y. 2024-25. 2. Shri M.K. Chowdhary, ld. AR represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Rajib Jain, ld. CIT-DR represented on behalf of the revenue. 3. It was submitted by the ld. Authorised Representative that all the details called

AL ALMAAS HAIDER CHARITABL TRUSTE ,SHOP NO FIRST, FIRST FLOOR GEL CHURCH COMPLEX vs. EXEMPTION WARD RANCHI, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, MAIN ROAD RANCHI,

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 206/RAN/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed
2
ITAT Ranchi
08 Oct 2025
AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 12ASection 80G

Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the A.Y. 2024-25. 2. Shri M.K. Chowdhary, ld. AR represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Rajib Jain, ld. CIT-DR represented on behalf of the revenue. 3. It was submitted by the ld. Authorised Representative that all the details called

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 303/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 304/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 305/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 306/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 300/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 301/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

JEEVAN REKHA TRUST,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 23/RAN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M.K.Chowdhary, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 194JSection 80Section 80G

trust under the name Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submitted that the assessee was also running two medical shops in the said hospital, where generic medicines were sold. It was submission that the assessee was receiving consideration in the form of 3% of the total turnover of Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submission that the running

JEEVAN REKHA TRUST,DHANBAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 24/RAN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M.K.Chowdhary, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 194JSection 80Section 80G

trust under the name Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submitted that the assessee was also running two medical shops in the said hospital, where generic medicines were sold. It was submission that the assessee was receiving consideration in the form of 3% of the total turnover of Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submission that the running