THE STRAY ARMY CHARITABLE TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(E), EXEMPTION WARD JAMSHEDPUR / CIT(E) PATNA, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

Charitable Trust, filed appeals against the order denying them registration u/s. 12A and recognition u/s. 80G. The trust, started in 2022 by youngsters, failed to respond to the Ld. CIT(E)'s notice due to ignorance of procedures and lack of counsel. The appeal before the Tribunal was also delayed by 400 days on similar grounds.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned

THE STRAY ARMY CHARITABLE TRUST,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO(E), EXEMPTION WARD JAMSHEDPUR / CIT(E) PATNA, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable trust, was denied registration u/s. 12A and recognition u/s. 80G for AY 2024-25 by the Ld. CIT(E). The delay in filing appeals was attributed to the ignorance of the young founders regarding procedures. The Ld. CIT, DR had no objection to the restoration of the issue.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

80G of the Act which was rejected. Since, the issues in all the appeals are common except the figures and parties name, therefore, all the appeals are heard together and pass this consolidated order in the appeals. First, we take up the ITA No. 301/RAN/2024. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed an application in Form

JEEVAN REKHA TRUST,DHANBAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust under the name Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submitted that the assessee was also running two medical shops in the said hospital, where generic medicines were sold. It was submission that the assessee was receiving consideration in the form of 3% of the total turnover of Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submission that the running

JEEVAN REKHA TRUST,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust under the name Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submitted that the assessee was also running two medical shops in the said hospital, where generic medicines were sold. It was submission that the assessee was receiving consideration in the form of 3% of the total turnover of Blue Sapphire Healthcare Private Limited. It was submission that the running