AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

3) of Section 12AA of the Act, empowers the Commissioner to cancel the registration of the Trust or Institution, if he is satisfied that the activities of such Trust or Institution are not genuine or are not carried out in accordance with the objects of the Trust or Institution. 9. Section 11 of the Act contemplates that the income

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

section 11 and 12 of the Act. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed. Kolkata, the 28th April, 2023. [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 28.04.2023. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. S S Charitable Trust 2. ITO, Exemption Ward, Ranchi 3

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued, in response to which the Secretary of the Trust appeared and produced the documents required for verification of the P a g e 3 | 7 Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust Vs ITO(E) application of income for charitable

SHREE DIGAMBER JAIN BHAWAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIO), PATNA

In the result, we find that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

charitable in nature and whether the activities which the Trust proposed to carry on are genuine in the sense that they are in line with the objects of the Trust. In contrast, the position would be different where the Commissioner proposes to cancel the registration of a Trust under sub-section (3

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

trust has to be deducted to arrive at the income available for application to charitable and religious purposes. The CIT(A) observed that the books of accounts of assessee were duly audited and assessee is running educational institution and had spent money under the head of maintenance of buildings and other assets to the tune of Rs.1

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

section 10(23)( c )(vi) of the IT Act and has held that mere surplus does not mean that institution is existing for M/s. Church School making profit. The predominant object test must be applied. Hon’ble Apex Court while affirming the decision of Punjab and Haryana High court in case of Pine Grove international charitable trust v/s Union

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

3. With the assistance of ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. A perusal of the record would suggest that the assessee is a Charitable Institution duly registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. It has claimed depreciation, which was disallowed to it by the ld. Assessing Officer on the ground that the assessee has already

M/S MANAVTA,JAMTARA vs. CIT EXPEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. Heard the parties, perused the relevant materials available on records. As it appears from the records that the case of the assessee is this that the objects of the trust is charitable in nature and the entire receipts is to be applied for charitable purposes. Sufficient press cuttings, copy of reports of charitable work by providing health care

SHREE SREE BALANANDA TRUST,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryshree Sree Balananda Trust, I.T.O., Sri Sri Balananda Ashram, Karinabad, Exemption Ward, Vs. Deoghar, Dist.- Deoghar, Dhanbad. Jharkhand-841112 Pan No. Aabts 0579 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

3. The assessee has raised a legal ground wherein it has been contended that whether through an intimation under Section 143(1) of the Act, the department can deny exemption of a Trust under Section 11 of the Act. It has been the contention of assessee that whether the assessee is eligible for the claim of exemption under Section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Charitable Trust ₹1,20,000/- to Manorama Sinha respectively. The Assessing Officer held that the above payments were excessive and unreasonable, and accordingly invoked the provisions of section 13(1)(c) of the Act, thereby denying exemption under section 11 of the Act and making additions to the income of the assessee. 3

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A was rejected. 3

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

section 2(15) of the LT. Act. Assesse Trust has been granted registered u/s 12AA of the income tax Act as per order of CIT (Jamshedpur) by verifying its objects and activities of educational institutions. The trust runs school and college purely on educational purpose. The Ld. A.O. was not justified in holding that the assesse trust is a business

JUSCO EDUCATION MISSION FOUNDATION ,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE , RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

3. Aggrieved by the order of Assessing Officer, the appellant-society filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) vide its impugned order, though, accepted the status of the appellant society as a "Trust, rejected the claim of the society that it is doing charitable activities on the ground that Section