AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

2) of Section 12AA of the Act, are procedural in nature, whereas Sub-section (3) of Section 12AA of the Act, empowers the Commissioner to cancel the registration of the Trust or Institution, if he is satisfied that the activities of such Trust or Institution are not genuine or are not carried out in accordance with the objects

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

section 11 and 12 of the Act. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed. Kolkata, the 28th April, 2023. [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 28.04.2023. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. S S Charitable Trust 2

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

charitable trust as contemplated by section 11(1)(a) and Section 7 IT A No.1 00/R an/2 014 Asse ssmen t Year: 2

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

charitable activity being relief to the poor and hence, exemption u/s.11 of the Act is to be allowed. He relied on the decision of Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust & Ors (supra), wherein, the Tribunal held that the registration granted to the assessee trust prove that objects of the assessee trust were advancement

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Trust Tax (Appeals)-3, Patna dated 17th September, 2018 passed for A.Y. 2013-14. 2. Though the Revenue has taken four grounds of appeal, but the only issue involved in the appeal is whether assessee is entitled for depreciation amounting to Rs.1,32,68,744/-. 3. With the assistance of ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully

SHREE SREE BALANANDA TRUST,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryshree Sree Balananda Trust, I.T.O., Sri Sri Balananda Ashram, Karinabad, Exemption Ward, Vs. Deoghar, Dist.- Deoghar, Dhanbad. Jharkhand-841112 Pan No. Aabts 0579 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

2. In this case, the return of income was filed by the assessee within due date under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). However, the assessee failed to furnish Form-10 and accordingly failed to satisfy one of the twin conditions specified under Section 13(9) of the Act. Even during the appellate

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

section 2(15) of the LT. Act. Assesse Trust has been granted registered u/s 12AA of the income tax Act as per order of CIT (Jamshedpur) by verifying its objects and activities of educational institutions. The trust runs school and college purely on educational purpose. The Ld. A.O. was not justified in holding that the assesse trust is a business

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

2) of section 139 of the Act. In other words, if a return is filed within the time specified in sub-section (4) of section 139 of the Act and the option contemplated by the Explanation to section 11(1) is exercised in writing along with such return, the requirements of the Explanation to section 11(1) would stand satisfied

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

2) of section 139 of the Act. In other words, if a return is filed within the time specified in sub-section (4) of section 139 of the Act and the option contemplated by the Explanation to section 11(1) is exercised in writing along with such return, the requirements of the Explanation to section 11(1) would stand satisfied

M/S MANAVTA,JAMTARA vs. CIT EXPEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia& Ms. Madhumita Roy

2. The assessee trust filed an application on 11.11.2016 for grant of approval under section 12AA of the Act. On the date of hearing the details were duly filed before the Revenue by the assessee in respect of such grant of approval upon perusal of which particularly, the audited M/s. Manavta Vidyasagar vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year –N.A. account

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued, in response to which the Secretary of the Trust appeared and produced the documents required for verification of the P a g e 3 | 7 Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust Vs ITO(E) application of income for charitable

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

2. First, we shall take up the appeal in ITA No. 103/Ran/2016 for the A.Y 2011-12- by the assessee. M/s. Church School ITA No. 103/Ran/2016 for the A.Y 2011-12 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust. It conducts its activities under the name & style as ‘Church School. The assessee filed